Forum Discussion
31 Replies
- @BFI-KinJO187 Oh yeah, I'd be down for a revamp of Metro. Loved that map.
@GRiPSViGiL wrote:
@BFI-KinJO187I think you mean scatter nade maps right?Exactly
There's no making a good CQC experience in this game because of the amount of grenade spam which is probably the worst it's ever been because of the scatter grenade
- ElliotLH4 years agoHero+
An infantry only map like Locker etc would be great.
- Dedzigs4 years agoSeasoned Ace
I'm down for some close quarters. 👍
- cso77774 years agoSeasoned Ace
@InS_HypnoI agree the scatter grenades are dumb.
And the 'netcode' is so bad, that playing CQC is not really working. You get insta-killed, die behind cover/walls, hits don't register etc, all the time and it is just too frustrating. - BFI-KinJO1874 years agoRising Scout
The 2042 game imo is pretty much trash, just gone from 2042 to bf4 and wow playing battlefield 4 was like playing a new game compared to it and much more enjoyable.
Im not hating on 2042 but it is trash.. everything about it.. SUCKS! I think if they released at least one good map then it would be more enjoyable.
- Twordy4 years agoSeasoned Ace@BFI-KinJO187 Oh man. Once I wrote on the forum that the maps from previous BFs exported to 2042... stood for a slaughterhouse concept.
Now I truly regret not getting one. I`m playing Infantry Conquest Only. Maps from BF BC2 are my jam on 100% or from 1942 and 3. 64 players in Conquest is more than enough with detailed maps with destruction.
Condor and Hind are simply OP, new attack choppers are over maneuverable, physics of the tank is as fascinating as pushing a shopping cart full of cardboard.
So yeah. Please DICE bring Metro, Grand Bazaar, Locker, and Karkand to the next Battlefield for a max of 64 players - this could be an instant banger. No need for 128 players in Conquest with enormous distances on every single map! BC2 maps are way more fun to play than anything in 2042.
Please study the design of the maps from previous BFs, assets on the map, character movement, division of roles as classes, and commander mode. Do not focus on chasing so-called "trends" while dropping/removing old mechanics or whatever EA/DICE calls features.
@BFI-KinJO187 wrote:
@XSive_Drezyup kinda like a karkand style map, it has some armored vehicles but it does not really affect the inf gameplay, how about a Metro 2042! i think that would be fun.I would love a Karkand style map, always enjoyed playing it.
I think all BF's should have a variety of styles to satisfy all players needs.
- GrizzGolf4 years agoSeasoned Ace
I would love that
- BFI-KinJO1874 years agoRising Scout
The thing is they turn a blind eye on bad feedback.. they only acknowledge you or respond if you are giving good feedback.. if its bad feedback you get ignored. there clueless general managers and staff are killing this game with zero experience on past games new or old..
You look at there you tube interviews and these people are just puppets and well you can see they are clueless.. making this trash game with simple things missing from the game..
you want to join your buds who are already in a server? Good luck with that..
You want to switch teams or join a friends squad.. no chance!
you want a proper loadout system? lol your asking waaay too much now..
and so on.. it feels like there team now has a total of about 8 people.. it shows in there garbage games and they go on about all they are doing is focusing on quality.. that is a joke in itself i must have missed that when i blinked.
next bf should be a normal.. modern day shooter, no future bs or ww2 bs just modern day ffs!
use bf2 bf3 or bf4 as a template clearly your skills cannot create a great game anymore from scratch.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 8 hours ago
- 12 hours ago