Cheesier graphics after update...
Is it me or do the graphics look even cheesier after the 3.2 update? Starting look like an iPhone game.
Forum Discussion
The graphics in BFV and BF1 look so much better than 2042 imo. I guess this is due to the 2042 maps being bigger. With all Ultra settings on PC some of the BVF and BF1 maps are just stunning and the lighting looks amazing. 2042 looks more cartoon like imo and lacks textures and details on most maps.
@ Yeah, I've had enough too. Reinstalling 4, 1 and V...
I went back to BFV a week before Christmas and haven't regretted it at all, everything about it is just miles better than 2042. Once I get bored of that I'll head back to BF1 as well.
- @RipGroove99 Well if you get so easily bored in 2 weeks youll be on another game mate . Its not the game at this point ..
- @RipGroove99 Problem mostly come with lower FPS for some reason visually lower graphics yet running on a 144+ herrz display simply look more silky and has less noise and artefacts ...
Even borderlands 3 for exemple look worst in 60hz maz setting than it does at min med high blend at 130 fps ...
BF2042 does not run super well on many system .. Graphics look more crisp and better in hazardzone than i breaktrough 128 ... but its going to be hard for dice to make it run 100% well ..even SW Battlefront 2 look super nice sometime but there is instance were FPS massively drops and makes graphics look terrible@Stew360I'm maxxing out 2042 graphics, all ultra at 3440x1440 100fps minimum on a 100Hz monitor and the graphics still look worse than BF1 and BFV, the details and texture just aren't there on most 2042 maps because it was rushed.
BFV and BF1 look stunning all Ultra 3440x1440
- @RipGroove99 Of course " You do mate " and with what exactly ? I have the best RTX3080 money can buy my frequency goes to over 2090mhz and my card dont even surpass the 60% utilisation and if i run at 4k with Tensor core accelerated DLDLSS i wont get 100 fps so sorry it aint plausible ..
Also Orbital especially with rain effect etc.. look a billion time better than BFV even on medium low setting ... like come on ..
- @RipGroove99 I even play with High textures and when I zoom on the ground, some parts of the maps has pixellated textures. XD The whole game looks absolutely terrible. But! For multiplayer this clean look (minus the 20 years old textures) is amazing. Game has amazing visiblity.
- @Jozso987 Oh yeah well technically low res textures and all that is perfect for super competitive type games but the BF franchise was (and has done since it's been around) supposed to lean towards more of a gritty realistic type game, they used to make such a fuss about how detailed their maps were and how amazing they looked back when they launched previous BF titles.
@RipGroove99
Since its been around ? Hahaha ... BF before BF3 has never ever been a showcase of beauty at all ..
BFBC wasnt pretty at all .. BF2 was not graphically amasing either not even for its time period ..
You could not compare BF to a Killzone 2 or a gears of wars back then the game was based on Combines arms gameplay and graphics were minimalistic etc.. .
Graphically intensive stuff came with the rework of Frostbite and BF3 and 4 prior to that BF was never " pretty " it was a okish to bad looking game at bestAlso BF2042 vegetation and explosions and tons of details are 10xtime better looking than past BF .. it also have a dynamic weather system wich is amasing looking ..
Its not just about how textures are when you zoom in .. i dont spend all day zooming in texture when i am playing .. they made some sacrifice here and there to bring more immersive stuff .. dynamic stuff on guns and track in snow , sand , dynamic weather system . tornados .. rain that start and stop and so on and on sandstorms
