Cheesier graphics after update...
Is it me or do the graphics look even cheesier after the 3.2 update? Starting look like an iPhone game.
Forum Discussion
@Stew360I'm maxxing out 2042 graphics, all ultra at 3440x1440 100fps minimum on a 100Hz monitor and the graphics still look worse than BF1 and BFV, the details and texture just aren't there on most 2042 maps because it was rushed.
BFV and BF1 look stunning all Ultra 3440x1440
@RipGroove99 Of course " You do mate " and with what exactly ? I have the best RTX3080 money can buy my frequency goes to over 2090mhz and my card dont even surpass the 60% utilisation and if i run at 4k with Tensor core accelerated DLDLSS i wont get 100 fps so sorry it aint plausible ..
Also Orbital especially with rain effect etc.. look a billion time better than BFV even on medium low setting ... like come on ..
Also Orbital especially with rain effect etc.. look a billion time better than BFV even on medium low setting ... like come on ..
@Stew360 wrote:
@RipGroove99Of course " You do mate " and with what exactly ? I have the best RTX3080 money can buy my frequency goes to over 2090mhz and my card dont even surpass the 60% utilisation and if i run at 4k with Tensor core accelerated DLDLSS i wont get 100 fps so sorry it aint plausible ..
Also Orbital especially with rain effect etc.. look a billion time better than BFV even on medium low setting ... like come on ..Don't be sad, this is just how it turns out sometimes. If you can't afford good hardware for the game, don't play it.
@Stew360Not at all bothered if you don't believe me but for reference, 3090, 11900k, 32GB of very low latency and fast RAM and m.2 SSD's (about 15500 score in Time Spy). If was at all bothered and even still playing 2042 I'd do a quick video showing my settings and FPS and performance in game but I really have no desire to launch 2042 and I'm not even slightly bothered if people on the internet doubt the performance of my PC. And I'm not surprised you are struggling with a non Ti 3080 tbh. Just to add insult I'm not even using DLSS either, I get more than enough FPS without it.
@Stew360Wasn't the standard 3080 released in like 2020? Obviously it won't be able to max out a big game like 2042 that came out very late 2021. So 'the best 3080 money can buy' as you put it just doesn't have the horsepower to max out 2042 at 4k or 3440x1440 Ultrawide, especially if not paired with a beast of a CPU. Just because you paid a lot of money for it 2 years ago doesn't mean it'll smash all current games at high Res all ultra. 2042 is poorly optimized as well, the only reason my system can handle it is because my CPU and GPU are just powering through the poor optimization.
@RipGroove99
My man your 3090 wont change a thing .. MY GPU is not even touching the 60% utilization sometime dropping in the 40% lol .. My friend with the exact same system gets the exact same frame rate as i do .. laos i have spend hours trying to find wich setting impact the CPU load the most and how to optimize the game to its best ..
ALso my card is not any 3080 and its running at 2090Mhz OC and its 1 in 10 000 cards that can even nearly achieve this .. yet my card is unused in BF so yeah .. My bet is you have anything between 60 and 70 fps in 4k in large battles and anywhere between 80 to 90 fps in smaller game modes ..
Yet the experience is much better at higher FPS in 1440p with some tweak in the settings ..To have decent looking graphics with the best performances possible with no stutter as much as possible ... Fluidity always result in a better looking experience and will be more pleasing to the eyes
A 120+ FPS experience on a high refresh rate monitor will look better at mediums 120fps than it does at ultra 60 fps .. thats just a plain facts and anyones having played on high refresh rate monitors knows that ..
BF2042 does not run terribly bad when you know how to make it run well and have decent hardware . but the thing is a game that isnt fluid enough create visual artefact and blur the texture and make everything look badIn most games the difference between a 3090 and a 3080 stock not mine is barely 5 to 10 fps at best .. My card run at 2090Mhz wich most 3080 dont even reach the 1950mhz mark without getting unstable thats said MY card is barely used in BF so yeah
- @Stew360 Well of course you know how my system runs better than I do. I have zero desire to prove anything to you so uh, I'm out of this thread.
- @Stew360 the CPU is the issue in this engine, not the GPU.
I have the 3080FTW3 and 12700KF. 120fps is totally doable @ 1440p.
The real issue with this game is the the frame-pacing above 90hz, not the framerate, per se.- @afzSnickelfritz
Exactly in 1440p i have no doubt about this in 4k unfortunaly regardless i havnt seen anyones neither with a 3080 or 3080ti or 3090 being able to get much more than a 70ish FPS on average ...
In 1440p me with a 3080 my friend over with a 3090 and M4 with a 2070super we all have very similar FPS wich can be anywhere between 80 Lows and 110 to 130 FPS average it depends a lots but if i am getting 110 in an area we all get around 110 in the same area at the same momment
