Cheesier graphics after update...
Is it me or do the graphics look even cheesier after the 3.2 update? Starting look like an iPhone game.
Forum Discussion
@RipGroove99
My man your 3090 wont change a thing .. MY GPU is not even touching the 60% utilization sometime dropping in the 40% lol .. My friend with the exact same system gets the exact same frame rate as i do .. laos i have spend hours trying to find wich setting impact the CPU load the most and how to optimize the game to its best ..
ALso my card is not any 3080 and its running at 2090Mhz OC and its 1 in 10 000 cards that can even nearly achieve this .. yet my card is unused in BF so yeah .. My bet is you have anything between 60 and 70 fps in 4k in large battles and anywhere between 80 to 90 fps in smaller game modes ..
Yet the experience is much better at higher FPS in 1440p with some tweak in the settings ..To have decent looking graphics with the best performances possible with no stutter as much as possible ... Fluidity always result in a better looking experience and will be more pleasing to the eyes
A 120+ FPS experience on a high refresh rate monitor will look better at mediums 120fps than it does at ultra 60 fps .. thats just a plain facts and anyones having played on high refresh rate monitors knows that ..
BF2042 does not run terribly bad when you know how to make it run well and have decent hardware . but the thing is a game that isnt fluid enough create visual artefact and blur the texture and make everything look bad
In most games the difference between a 3090 and a 3080 stock not mine is barely 5 to 10 fps at best .. My card run at 2090Mhz wich most 3080 dont even reach the 1950mhz mark without getting unstable thats said MY card is barely used in BF so yeah
@Stew360 Well of course you know how my system runs better than I do. I have zero desire to prove anything to you so uh, I'm out of this thread.
- @RipGroove99
Well please if you can post a video of your FPS while playing and setting i would love to look at it thanks ! @RipGroove99
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvp40zz3V-0
Here i have a video of " your " almost exact system in 4K the difference between a 11900k anb a 10900k is minimal especially in this game
and its running just like i have expected it to
And here is the exact specs you mentioned and run also in the realms of what i have expected from this as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXJzv__eRN4@David6479
Yeah i have mistakenly not posted the one with the 10900k but well it was still very similar lol between 60 to 75 fps at best .. and if using tensor core etc.. it could go to the 75-85 ish but well thatts another story ..
Its exactly as i expected .. the game dosnt run in the High 120 fpps lol thats for sure My 3080 Score the same on many games as many 3090 with 3 to 5 fps difference its insanely minimal yet my card isnt used much in 1440p and is not fully used in 4k but the limiting factor atm is CPU mostly but also there is some backend work to be done ..
I have also noticed that servers performances affect FPS in this game similar to star citizen .. i have had some full 128 players servers that ran into the 120-140 fps 1 day before patch 3.02 when normally i was running around 90fps so there is some odd stuff that make the game less fluid wich affect the visual perception make texture look worst ..
Just watch a 30 fps youtube video on your phone then watch a 60fps cap video and you will see a imediate difference and you will feel as if texture are more crisp in the 60fps video then well while gaming there is even more difference between over 100 fps and 60 fps or belowWas this one https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpbODop4WhI
@Stew360 I'm no expert and I've been out the custom pc building for a few years but the videos are at different stages of the game being updated and also surly having one system using Windows 11 and the other Windows 10 effects the handling of the CPU allocation.
I know we are talking about the CPU but the GPU Nvidia drivers in one are 472.12 with 511.23 being the most recent, I'm not disagreeing with you or anything just too many variables in the Videos.
- @David6479
My friend over has a 3090 watercool and a I910900k wich is pretty equivalent to the 11900k and he has between 60 and 80 fps depending on the load 80 being the best in 4k so he play in 1440p with optimised setting and he gets about the same type of FPS as me with a 3080 OC and My friend M4 gets similar fps with only a 2070 super lol so there is that @Stew360 I'm not disagreeing with you but if it's one thing I've learned from my overclocking days is that NO two systems are the same no matter if they had exactly the same hardware. Operating system, overclocking, a custom GPU BIOS, throttling due to poor cooling, GPU drivers, even just having OC monitoring software or some overlay in the background can add stuttering.
I've mostly found it's software related in past experiments.
- @David6479 You won't get anywhere with him, I know exactly what performance my PC was getting with 2042 before Christmas and he's telling me I'm wrong lol I simply can't be bothered to try to convince him because what's the point? I couldn't care less if someone on a forum doesn't believe me about something, especially when I 100% know I'm right.
- @David6479
Of course , the ASIC quality on my 3080 is off the charts thanks to pure Silicone lottery luck .. But my card easily raise to 2080 to 2090mhz while most peoples crash below 2010 and some cant even pass the 2000mhz most card default clock is 1710mhz mine is 1795mhz but i can raise it by 140 and with the boost it goes to 2080 to 2090 easy wich is pretty insane and i score insane score in 3dmark and in games ...
But game that does not utilize my GPU properly dont benefits much from it @RipGroove99
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnsRy9X6jj0
Here you have it wiith a 12900k 😉https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnsRy9X6jj0
Anyway if you pretend this game is bad looking i cant help you ... there is clearly something wrong
@Stew360 I know all about the golden chips and I wouldn't go of the ASIC chart, It's real world results we look for. That also goes for 3DMark, I've lost countless hours watching those over the years and you only need it to complete the one cycle to get the score you want for bragging rights. It will always be top end gaming that stresses any overclock.
@Stew360You know I'm running 3440x1440 don't you, which is 1440p Ultrawide 21:9 or can't you read properly? 3440x1440 = 4,953,600 pixels and 4k (3840x2160) = 8,294,400 pixels so there is quite a big difference in the horsepower needed. It's basic math, or did you completely go off on a rant without actually reading my post properly...
At no point did I say I was running 4k. I said I was maxxing out the graphics settings in the game at 3440x1440
