Forum Discussion
The graphics in BFV and BF1 look so much better than 2042 imo. I guess this is due to the 2042 maps being bigger. With all Ultra settings on PC some of the BVF and BF1 maps are just stunning and the lighting looks amazing. 2042 looks more cartoon like imo and lacks textures and details on most maps.
- 4 years ago@Jozso987 Oh yeah well technically low res textures and all that is perfect for super competitive type games but the BF franchise was (and has done since it's been around) supposed to lean towards more of a gritty realistic type game, they used to make such a fuss about how detailed their maps were and how amazing they looked back when they launched previous BF titles.
- 4 years ago
@RipGroove99
Since its been around ? Hahaha ... BF before BF3 has never ever been a showcase of beauty at all ..
BFBC wasnt pretty at all .. BF2 was not graphically amasing either not even for its time period ..
You could not compare BF to a Killzone 2 or a gears of wars back then the game was based on Combines arms gameplay and graphics were minimalistic etc.. .
Graphically intensive stuff came with the rework of Frostbite and BF3 and 4 prior to that BF was never " pretty " it was a okish to bad looking game at bestAlso BF2042 vegetation and explosions and tons of details are 10xtime better looking than past BF .. it also have a dynamic weather system wich is amasing looking ..
Its not just about how textures are when you zoom in .. i dont spend all day zooming in texture when i am playing .. they made some sacrifice here and there to bring more immersive stuff .. dynamic stuff on guns and track in snow , sand , dynamic weather system . tornados .. rain that start and stop and so on and on sandstorms
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 31 minutes ago
- 3 hours ago
- 7 hours ago