Forum Discussion

Airstriker97's avatar
Airstriker97
4 years ago

Clans/Platoon system needs to be added ASAP with team swapping

We need to have clans added like we have in every battlefield and every game that is out there. The bottom part of ID cards works great for the location. The non-patriarchy ID but if in a clan says (...
discussion
VOLBANKER_PC's avatar
VOLBANKER_PC
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago

Ah yes, the joy of being put into a round with 4+ clan players on the same side….

Clans should play on their own servers instead of ruining the game for everyone else.

X-Sunslayer-X's avatar
X-Sunslayer-X
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago
@VOLBANKER_PC you know with or without tags they will still play together...
2042 only made it impossible to play with more then 3 people at a time
  • VOLBANKER_PC's avatar
    VOLBANKER_PC
    Seasoned Ace
    4 years ago

    Clans ruin the team balance a lot of the time in BF1 for example. So no thanks to anything that helps clans play together.

    • fragnstein's avatar
      fragnstein
      4 years ago
      @VOLBANKER_PC Sounds like a good plan to remove any kind of team play, along with the voip. Then we can complain how team mates don't heal/revive/repair/give ammo. Any way to make a lone wolf's experience more pleasant
      • BR-DuaneDibbley's avatar
        BR-DuaneDibbley
        Seasoned Ace
        4 years ago

        @fragnstein

        I'd say for any clan, VOIP was not really 'removed' as we never used that before anyway (we use TeamSpeak, others use Discord).

        The problem was that team play was removed along with any kind of meaningful squad management. It took us several minutes each match to finally join the server only to be thrown back out after the round ends. This was what made us go back to the older titles (or to WW3 and HLL as many of us now play those titles). Let's hope WW3 gets more content and they get the server problems sorted as this is also not a game that can be considered a good replacement for BF2042 at the moment. Maybe in the future. And definitely sooner than BF2042.

    • X-Sunslayer-X's avatar
      X-Sunslayer-X
      Seasoned Ace
      4 years ago
      @VOLBANKER_PC are we talking about 10+ ppl stacking or a simple party of 4/5 because if 5 players can dominate an entire team i'd blame your teamates to be just a bit on the usless side of things
    • cKrash32's avatar
      cKrash32
      4 years ago
      @VOLBANKER_PC I think BF is (or was) all about cohesive squad play. Bigger squads brought more team play and better rewards. I think one of the best features of BF V was that “stick to your squad” strategy that paid off very well.
      Thought-out the history of BF the team element was always super important. Team work takes strategy. Strategy takes patience. And Patience takes maturity. Which is what draws me to the BF franchise. I feel BF has always taking a higher level of intelligence to play and I think the reason for that is it supports a high level of teamwork.

      But I think we should have all the player base information on the scoreboard, including tags, that way we can choose to stay or go to another game.

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,972 PostsLatest Activity: 6 hours ago