We apologise for daring to innovate instead of giving you BF4 2.0.
We apologise for creating fun characters.
We apologise for not catering to milsim larpers.
We apologise for giving players more freedom.
We apologise for introducing new soldier abilities with specialists.
We apologise for giving old fans large classic maps.
We apologise for our in game maps matching the pre-rendered images.
We apologise for our innovative dynamic weather model.
We apologise for giving you portal to create your own games on fan favourite maps.
We apologise for making a fun game.
Alternative version.
We apologise, we will do better, we will treat this as a learning experience and grow from here.
To show our commitment to helping the community through this difficult time we have all changed our Facebook and Instagram profile pics to r/battlefield2042.
We feel your pain, we feel your injustice, and we stand with you as we progress towards a new battlefield 4 utopia together as comrades.
@Tank2042Man wrote:We apologise for daring to innovate instead of giving you BF4 2.0.
We apologise for creating fun characters.
We apologise for not catering to milsim larpers.
We apologise for giving players more freedom.
We apologise for introducing new soldier abilities with specialists.
We apologise for giving old fans large classic maps.
We apologise for our in game maps matching the pre-rendered images.
We apologise for our innovative dynamic weather model.
We apologise for giving you portal to create your own games on fan favourite maps.
We apologise for making a fun game.
Alternative version.
We apologise, we will do better, we will treat this as a learning experience and grow from here.
To show our commitment to helping the community through this difficult time we have all changed our Facebook and Instagram profile pics to r/battlefield2042.
We feel your pain, we feel your injustice, and we stand with you as we progress towards a new battlefield 4 utopia together as comrades.
- making everything worse and removing features that became the default standard because it just works is not innovation. It's resetting all knowledge to zero... You can do a factory reset for a new IP and call it innovation, but not in Battlefield.
- fun characters would be fine in a spin off with a not so dark theme. But the tone of 2042 want to be dark and apocalyptic. "fun characters" don't fit + they are not fun. They are just cringe and not likeable at all.
- ? xD
- "more freedom" is a very poor excuse for "we did not test balancing at all and didn't know what we want so just do whatever..."
- doing specialists is not the problem. It's more HOW they did it.
- thx for old maps that are worse than the originals (at least in case of BF3 and BC2) and for new maps were nobody took a single minute thinking about gameflow
- they don't
- dynamic weather isn't new and has been better in BF1 and BFV. Even the more scripted weather from BF4 (Paracel storm, gulf of oman) and Hardline (Dust bowl) had way more impact and way better visuals.
- Portal is a nice tool in theory but it's not an excuse to not implement the old maps properly and not doing fan fav gamemodes just because they could do it by themself.
- "fun game"
