Forum Discussion
We should all boycott this game if no server browser comes with season two.
That is the only way to cut Bitcoins Battlecoins revenue and hurt them. We kill this game ASAP and they bleed until they get the next Battlefield done. If they rush, they will pay for it again (no more pre order). If they want to deliver a good product, they will have to put some work into it.
Don't feel sorry for them. Last year, EA's CEO Andrew Wilson, made $19 million with bonuses! And that was down from 2020, when he made $39 million! That is how much I would like to make once in a lifetime! There is no university, knowledge or justice that justify that! He is not the founder, he is not drilling for oil. Imagine the cumulative gain, other investments, and who knows what goes under the table!
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2022-06-20-ea-ceos-salary-drop-to-usd19-9-million
I have a feeling that if I start a thread saying "No server browser = boycott" I would be banned. I got a warning for something much smaller and I told the guy to f* off. But maybe someone.woth two accounts could be willing to take that risk.
So, that is what I think would make them listen to us. Opening friendly threads here has proven to be ineffective!
They don't respond to sensitive subjects. If someone says "I want another drone dog, a scout one that can repair or destroy tanks" they will see the opportunity to make that a Battlepass item to sell it with the premium pass or bitcoins Battlefield currency. Then it aligns with their plans and they will announce it from the top of the tallest building "you wanted dogs? We heard you". They only respond when something is easy to do, it is on their plans, or it is a lucrative idea. Look at how lazy it was the fix for vehicles taking the flags before siders. They added a few seconds to the countdown. Damn it! How can they get away with that? What a shame!
Damn! I should not have mentioned the new dog. Or an infrared scope to see through smoke... $$$
- VOLBANKER_PC4 years agoSeasoned Ace
Yes, team switch is such a good idea. Then the best players will be able to switch to the same side and steamroll the enemy team like it so often happens in BF1. And if your team is losing, wave goodbye to 1 or more of the top players from your team ‘cause they switch to the winning team.
- 4 years ago
@VOLBANKER_PC wrote:Yes, team switch is such a good idea. Then the best players will be able to switch to the same side and steamroll the enemy team like it so often happens in BF1. And if your team is losing, wave goodbye to 1 or more of the top players from your team ‘cause they switch to the winning team.
I hate that ability, used to happen all the time. HOWEVER, they should let you change squads on the same team. So like when you get in that rando squad that the other 3 players are all 200m+ apart and 500m+ from any objective, sniping or playing with themselves in the spawn, you can switch to a hopefully more coordinated squad, or at least a squad that has one or two guys close to the objectives to spawn on...
- VOLBANKER_PC4 years agoSeasoned Ace@Echo6Echo Yes, I agree. It’s crazy they release a Battlefield game where you can’t even switch to another squad! It’s what I consider basic functionality that just has to be present in the game.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 8 hours ago
- 11 hours ago
- 11 hours ago
- 12 hours ago
- 14 hours ago