Delete Specialists, Delete the Maps
I hate all out warfare because of the specialists and the awful map design. The graphics are also a whole separate issue that I'm not going to talk about. But Dice, please delete these two massive pr...
Forum Discussion
@dirtytamato
They have to shut down this game for a year, and make it BATTLEFIELD in this time.
They have to shut down this game for a year, and make it BATTLEFIELD in this time.
- @FatFranz
You are free to just back to whatever BF in the series is a BF to you .. and stop requesting things that no ones want beside a handfull of overly vocal and totally unrealistic players .. Who ask each and everyones of them a different " Vision " of what they call battlefield ...
Ive played BF for longer than pretty much anyones on these forums .. And sorry but beside breakaway and Kaleidoscope the maps are very good for conquest WICH IS THE true BF experience ...
Also in find this BF to be the best BF they ever made since BF2 ... BF3 was not bad per say neither BF4 but they were not as good as BF2042 in so many aspect ..
Some maps needs improovement here and there .. So balance issues need to be adressed here and there ... But DICE dosnt have to shut the game or fundamentally changed it ...
They created PORTAL just for peoples like these who want BF 2042 to be a carbon copy of old tittle .... Portal offer almost unlimited possibility ... But you know the truth ? Almost no ones want to play these even if they put lots of effort into the modable aspect .. Why ?
Because most peoples who dont spend a seconds on forums actually enjoy the base game more than these " Users created modes " wich they might play for an hour or so every now and then ..
Now the " Target audience " they had for portal want to force everyones into the " OLD " experience because they cant get populated servers for their " vision " of what BF should be .. Thats the reality
BF2042 base game is very much a battlefield wich at its core is a COnquest type game with combines arms gameplay , Air , Ground and infantry troops battltling out ! .- @Stew360 Stop saying you played this game longer than anyone else... I started the series with BF1942 Beta/demo. Doesn't make my opinion any better than someone who started with BF3...
If you think this is the best BF they ever made than you're in a very serious minority... Maybe this is exactly what YOU wanted out of a BF game, which again, is fair and your opinion. But MOST of the BF community did NOT want this hero-shooter wannabe...@Daeyon-beThere is no such thing as a BF homogeneous community ... All BF games were vastly different on so many level even BF2 and BF2 modern combat on xbox were vastly different on so many level yet they were both combine arms BFgames ...
BFBC and BF2 were insanely different on so many level even BFBC2 and BFBC1 were totally different on like hundreads of points yet were both BF games ...
Most BF2 players hated BF3 and called it out a COD games and so on and on and on and on ...
Everyone in what you call BF " COmmunity " all have vastly different expectation and so on .. Some wanted BF to be more realistic , some others want it more arcady . Some want totally destructible environments some others hates it and want more undestructibles covers ..
Some want 120mm tanks to have fixed rotation speed .. Some want back the arcady turret speed thst moove at mouse speed etc..etc..
For some BFV mechanics etc..is the gold standards for others irs BF2 others BF2142 others its BFBC2 others BF3 some others BF4 and some others None of the past BF ..
So sorry but there as never ever been a consensus about what BF should be next . wich BF should get a sequel .. Wich mechanics should go trough and so on... There has never ever been a BF who wasnt heavily criticized at launch on all level and BF2042 is no different Yet its as much a BF game as any other BF games who made things different .. BF2 , Bf2 Mc , BFBC , BF2142 , BF3 etc..
Since I have only played the beta, I am a little cautious of commenting on maps. But BF was built as a vehicle game on big maps. And as I see it, BF returns to this concept with BF2042.
So why is this not a true BF game in terms of mapdesign. Is it because the current player base want small / medium size maps with 10 sec between each flag.
Like I said, I'm not taking a stand. I'm just curious.
- @SirBobdk Its not the distance that's the issue of the maps, they just lack decent cover or in-between area's where the close combat can happen.
The way its designed now just feels like: Alright. We have vehicles. They should be able to reach everywhere so lets make points nice and open. Its fine to have vehicles on points but at some spots it renders infantry just being target practice.
- @Stew360 This was an extremely immature post. Your officially stating you've played BF longer then pretty much anyone in the forums...ok? Data to back that up, or grabbed out your hind end? Also, why would that matter? Also, your opinions on the maps are very much your own. I don't agree with that at all.
This is the best BF since 2? Better in so many aspects? What aspects? You just ended it there with nothing to support it. What aspects make 2042 better?
You're saying a lot of stuff without anything to back up whatever points you're trying to make. You're trying to make 'smart' looking statements and posts with nothing in it but a feeling of "Cause I said so". If you want to criticize, give reasons why or no one is going to take anything you said seriously.
