Forum Discussion
@filthy_vegans wrote:
@FatherDed- No. You know this. Don't be that guy. You can do better than that.
I'd scold my children for behaving like spoilt little * having a meltdown in a supermarket over whether or not they get barbecue sauce or ketchup for their dino nuggies.
I'm not being that guy. I was just trying to be humorous (failing) to illustrate a point. Maybe there have been some posts in the thread that are a bit brat-ish but I think in general people are just expressing a valid point of view in a reasonable way. There are people who have been fans of the franchise for 19 years now. They're disappointed at seeing it in this state and seeming to lose it's identity trying to be something else and just ending up being a poor shadow of what it was. I don't think it's fair to blanket label everyone in the thread as a spoiled child for just rightfully expressing their opinion and annoyance for what they've been given for their hard earned money.
The skin is just a representation of a complete change of tone and direction that people don't like. You pointed out the skins from previous games - it looks like they were just the thin end of the wedge. You can say, well get over it, EA is a business, they have a responsibility to their shareholders to maximise profit etc. But that's just shrugging at the corporate world taking yet another good thing that people enjoyed and turning it into a bland empty commodity. I think people have every right to be angry about it.
The skin is just a representation of a complete change of tone and direction that people don't like.
Should have seen this coming in BFV when the release featured skins of players looking more like thugs than soldiers. Not only disrespecting WWII, but the franchise as well.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
Connections à ubisoft
Solved9 hours ago- 15 hours ago