easy anti cheat is bad
why dont use/try battle-eye and others methode that ppl have suggestion in the forum, like votekick. EAC is notorious on others game,like the division , some youtuber have posted how bad it is from d...
Forum Discussion
@ragnarok013 At the time PB was the only big AC so to slight it for a modern AC is wrong 😉 PB was good when kept updated and if they had the ban list covering all servers ect. Even with the best AC at the time and a stats based one there were alot of cheaters its the game that was the final straw for being a PC gamer :P
1 AC back in the day now 6+ what does that tell you, more cheaters than ever there is a big market to counter them.
@1Hairy-Gorilla wrote:
@ragnarok013 At the time PB was the only big AC so to slight it for a modern AC is wrong 😉 PB was good when kept updated and if they had the ban list covering all servers ect. Even with the best AC at the time and a stats based one there were alot of cheaters its the game that was the final straw for being a PC gamer :P
1 AC back in the day now 6+ what does that tell you, more cheaters than ever there is a big market to counter them.
@1Hairy-Gorilla true and even back in the day we heard the same complaints about PB as we do with all ACs today so I think the problem is half AC performance and half player perception. Many of the instances where people are convinced that someone is cheating (outside of rage hackers) are usually things like ping differences, server tick rate, and connection route node ping instability coming together to make what you experience different from what the other person experienced.
You are correct that the market to sell these illicit goods has definitely increased as gaming has grown.
