Endless Matchmaking - Waiting For Players
Hi, It started approximately 2 weeks ago, I click play on Breakthrough (128 players) and I could not find a game at all, I do get a game or two in Conquest (128 players) after long hours of queue. I ...
Forum Discussion
@RayD_O1 Well the forums would not let me post the breakdown of MM vs Persistent Servers from Amazon Serversthat they use for this game but here is the link.
https://aws.amazon.com/gamelift/pricing/
https://aws.amazon.com/gamelift/pricing/
The lobby is not the way to go, especially for those who used to host their games and play together with small groups.
The lobby is a good solution for competitive, 5vs5 ranked games. 64 player Conquest as a lobby match is nada, no, zero incentive to play any longer. Not to mention a complete lack of any social aspects of the game. Everything comes down to sprint competitions against mass AI farms.
@Twordy wrote:The lobby is not the way to go, especially for those who used to host their games and play together with small groups.
The lobby is a good solution for competitive, 5vs5 ranked games. 64 player Conquest as a lobby match is nada, no, zero incentive to play any longer. Not to mention a complete lack of any social aspects of the game. Everything comes down to sprint competitions against mass AI farms.
If DICE continue to force MM on the BF community then as far as I am concerned it will be the death knell for the BF series.
As you mentioned it is managing to destroy the social aspect which in turn is driving players away in droves.
Sadly BF2042 no longer looks or feels like battlefield in any shape or form.
Featured Places
