Finally some truth. (From an ex-EA game changer)

So what they didn't make this battle field exactly the same as the old ones. Its a new game. if you like the old ones so much then keep playing those.

Every game has bugs on release. I've played dozens of BF 2042 games already and it feels very smooth. Yes there a few bugs but the game plays really well.. especially for just being released.

This EA game changer sounds like he had some wish list of things he wanted in the BF 2042 and they didn't make it in. Yeah, so what? I'm sure the developers did as much as they could in the time that they had. This is the best product they could deliver w/ their resources. You can write a giant list of things you want.. but if you don't have enough time and money.. then you will only get the top few of what you want.  I think they did a great job with this game. The graphics are amazing.. the fact that it can hold 128 people and I see no lag.. it plays very smoothly is absolutely amazing.

@grandlarsene  Not enough money EA lol. So your the only person to see no lag are you a dice employee on the defensive here?

Not defending anyone, just correcting your spreading of misinformation.

Read some of my other posts for the last 60 days and you'll find me to be quite upfront and fair in my assessments to both sides.

The game is not abandoned, and subcontracting has nothing to do with the matter as that process has always been used actively in all software development. No matter what the employed status is of any particular coder contributing to a project, DICE and EA are still legally responsible for that code and also to their customers.

You and others like you who are simply hell bent angry and not thinking clearly or making any sense need to stop talking already and STOP PLAYING the damn game and do a chargeback, if ytou are really that unhappy with a product. Coming here and spreading false rumors is not going to make your future gaming any more satisfying...but taking real action WILL.

@BigShottt  You are defending them. No misinformation the game released in a broken state? Have you ever seen a hovercraft drive up the side of a skyscraper? Also jump from one building to another? Have you ever seen a smg out perform a assualt rifle at mid range. It's just basic's and that just 2 examples and that's just the first thing you see straight away so how was it released like that?

They took money knowing the game was broken. You fire a rocket at the skirt of hover craft and nothing they just carry on at what point did not one dev/tester think hang on that's a weak point it should be disabled at that point..

Your trying to makeout there honest people who would not mis-inform you well they have and if you cannot see it well you cannot be helped.

I can not get a refund because i pre ordered and started the game even though i played less than 10hrs like the free trial offers!!

Exactly what a lot of us thought reading that review by an ex game changer (there were loads of passionate people who signed up and were game changers). Still people try to defend it but it was clear even from the beta something was off and there had been radical bad decisions at HQ that created this game.

It seems this is the way forward for them now, the 'old' BF is dead and they are creating their new 'meme apex' based battlefield, hence the clue in the terrible after battle screen cringe and the comments of a free to play BF coming next. Apex is also a EA game so they probably want full cohesion between the two. 

The empty bland maps (which are worse graphically than panned graphics of new halo) The 128 players decision seems to have stifled the artistic, technical and gameplay design of this entire game. I think all the designs, left out out things etc were all trying to meet the brief of 128 players