Forum Discussion
4 years ago
@gazgriff2k11 The thing about Firestorm in BFV was unfortunately that Dice did it completely wrong...
They butchered the core gameplay of the maingame to accomodate a much hated Battle Royale gamemode in BFV like reducing squadsize from 5 to 4 ppl, having clunky loot-mechanics and much more.
I had no to little interest in the Battlefield BR as I thought Apex had a better lore, setting, maps, gamemechanics and first and foremost better support from the devs. All other BR were so much better in every aspect of the game compared to Firestorm.
Therefore... I understand there is a demand for a BR-game in Battlefield, but it should under all circumstances be a Free2play standalone gamemode, which should be available digital only.
Revenue could be made from selling seasonpasses at 10USD and ofc. through sales of cosmetics in game.
Battlefield as a franchise needs to know their place and focus on what they are best at: Providing a sandbox open arcarde shooter-experience NOT Battleroyale!
They butchered the core gameplay of the maingame to accomodate a much hated Battle Royale gamemode in BFV like reducing squadsize from 5 to 4 ppl, having clunky loot-mechanics and much more.
I had no to little interest in the Battlefield BR as I thought Apex had a better lore, setting, maps, gamemechanics and first and foremost better support from the devs. All other BR were so much better in every aspect of the game compared to Firestorm.
Therefore... I understand there is a demand for a BR-game in Battlefield, but it should under all circumstances be a Free2play standalone gamemode, which should be available digital only.
Revenue could be made from selling seasonpasses at 10USD and ofc. through sales of cosmetics in game.
Battlefield as a franchise needs to know their place and focus on what they are best at: Providing a sandbox open arcarde shooter-experience NOT Battleroyale!
- 4 years ago@DeeCay_DK_81 I completely disagree, and thought that Apex was way off-balance, and a pay-to-win, bullet-sponging game. But that's okay; play whatever gives you the most enjoyment. For me, it was Firestorm, and I hope it returns.
PUBG felt outdated, right out of the box (still does), and Warzone is nothing but a cheat-fest, anymore, and no longer playable. H1Z1 on PS was fairly enjoyable, at first, but it didn't stay that way for long, and it, too, felt similar to PUBG.
Firestorm was the only one that really kept me playing.- SirBobdk4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@ChugKendall wrote:
and Warzone is nothing but a cheat-fest,It seems warzone is going to replace the current AC with easy anti cheat or battleeye.
- 4 years ago
DICE have said you can't make a Battle Royal in portal, this would be due the lobby system that you need to make Battle Royal to work. And in my case Firestorm failed because I just couldn't get in a game for the first month after launch. Then when I did come back to it 6 months later it was lobbies of about 20 max and a minimum wait between rounds of 5 minutes.
All they had to do was drop the game to 32p and lose the first circle then the game would have worked on at least 10 of the stock maps. If they had given that a go and create a smaller faster paced BR experience and it might of hung in there.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.15,984 PostsLatest Activity: 7 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 48 minutes ago
- 7 hours ago