Hazard zone

@bonez513 Firestorm 2.0 is gone and your sad? you should've known better that DICE / EA, didn't care about this mode.

[edit - removed picture]

Henderson also noted that Hazard Zone has less than 400 players across all platforms, which ties in a prior claim where he stated that, developer DICE stopped tracking player statistics in Hazard Zone within the first week of its launch because the number of players was so low.

It is a pity that Hazard Zone isn't going to be supported with new content but, and I know this isn't really a silver lining, at least the mode will still be there to play. At least that's my understanding right now. That said, it will make it much harder to unlock the associated achievements and so on as the player numbers potentially dwindle further.

At the same time if a mode isn't popular with the playerbase then I can understand cutting support, as it saves on resources and means efforts can be put towards different parts of the game.

---

@UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R wrote:
@bonez513 I'm glad HZ achievements were the first few I went for when the game released as I knew the mode would end up to be another Firestorm... Such a waste.

---

Had a similar feeling myself @UNL1M1T3D_P0W3R  but put them off rather than knocking them out. Ah well c'est la vie. 

@poohty_tI don't think they are referring it to Firestorm 2.0 as a second attempt at a BR. But a second half-assed, red-headed-stepchild mode that didn't fit the gameplay but was a waste of resources due to the cost/gameplay/etc.

It could have been successful, if it was a standalone, BF: Hazard Zone [or something] F2P title that would get people into the game similar to Warzone. From there they could be focused on all the specialists, gadgets, customizations, quips, and all that crap that most people didn't want for a regular BF game.