@VOLBANKER_PC wrote:
@cso7777I agree 100%. Clans are a pain in the b… in BF1.
Whenever 3 or 4 (sometimes more) guys from certain clans join the server I’m playing on, it’s always the same: Balance goes completely out the window and the team with the clan players is soon steamrolling the other team.
Battlefield is a team game though. I am against anything in this series that splits team players or platoons apart in matches. I am also sick of solo players constantly making excuses for why they don't want to be better team players in random matches. Platoons should be allowed to play with as many members as they want on the same team. Maybe if the solo players weren't so busy camping and playing selfishly ignoring the objectives and pretending like the score doesn't matter, then they wouldn't be getting steam rolled.
@Skill4Reel Balanced needs to be done before the round starts not at the end of a round. Switching to be with platoon just makes it worse.
It seems a few of us are sick of platoon players abuse.
1) these are public servers for all, not platoon training (more like trolling) grounds.
2) you just blamed solo for playing different. OMG your using 3rd party comms to bully others trying to have fun and their to blame.
Trying to keeping platoons has been part of the biggest imbalance in the game. DICE used a squad swap balance at end of round just kept the imbalance. Because squad 1 and squad 2 end the rounds usually as 1st and 3rd, while squad A finished 2nd staying on the opposite team.
I have heard the same excuse for years platoon are just friends want to play on the same team. It is solo players fault they lose because they don't work as a team which is a load of steamy rubbish.
DICE you are to blame, for years you listen to these so called platoons (removed commander,spot....) and made comms more 3rd party popular, this is way solo players don't work as a team because there is NO easy to use in game communication.
No one has stop platoons from playing together but platoon player instead blame others, whinge about unfairness and think they are the only ones that want fun.
@DingoKillrI hate to say it, but this all really sounds like you hate playing against a coordinated team and prefer playing solo most of the time.
Playing solo is fine of course, but from the beginning, Battlefield has encouraged team-play. In most games, as well as any real endeavor, well coordinated teams can accomplish more, and more quickly, than any individual.
I think keeping teams together is perfectly fine and preferable even. I would not want my group of friends, whether we are successful in-game or not, immediately broken up because the team balancer cannot match us against other teams easily. I would even wait longer for a match in that case, rather than be broken up.
As for 3rd party comms, that is what it is. Some people will prefer Discord to in-game VOIP. EA DICE is extremely limited on what they can do about that.
@carsono311 wrote:@DingoKillrI hate to say it, but this all really sounds like you hate playing against a coordinated team and prefer playing solo most of the time.
Playing solo is fine of course, but from the beginning, Battlefield has encouraged team-play. In most games, as well as any real endeavor, well coordinated teams can accomplish more, and more quickly, than any individual.
I think keeping teams together is perfectly fine and preferable even. I would not want my group of friends, whether we are successful in-game or not, immediately broken up because the team balancer cannot match us against other teams easily. I would even wait longer for a match in that case, rather than be broken up.
As for 3rd party comms, that is what it is. Some people will prefer Discord to in-game VOIP. EA DICE is extremely limited on what they can do about that.
Completely agree. I wouldn't have played BFV fpr 600 hours, if it wasn't for me and my mates. We are not even tryhards, we just play as a team and welcome every random. Most annoying thing is to get swapped in different teams and to reload the round, because you have to queue again.
Everyone can just get on a discord or here in the forums and find some mates to play with. It is really not that hard. If players don't want to do that, they should not complain about players playing as a team. Sounds hard, but a lot of randoms are useless anyways. You don't even need to communicate, just stick together as a squad and follow the orders from the squad leader. It really hurts seeing randoms in my squad, when me and my 2 mates or all Top 5 on the scoreboard, but the random is doing his own thing instead of just playing with us.
Which is why we need a internal NOT SHOWN skill ranking to be able to open a "Clansquad" up to 64 people and be matched against a little bit lower, same skill or alittle bit higher skilled players in BF2042.
But thats what the community also doesnt seem to want.
I wonder why it is working in CS GO (as example) for years having a skill group and finding enemys with the same skilllevel.
@carsono311 wrote:@DingoKillrI hate to say it, but this all really sounds like you hate playing against a coordinated team and prefer playing solo most of the time.
Playing solo is fine of course, but from the beginning, Battlefield has encouraged team-play. In most games, as well as any real endeavor, well coordinated teams can accomplish more, and more quickly, than any individual.
I think keeping teams together is perfectly fine and preferable even. I would not want my group of friends, whether we are successful in-game or not, immediately broken up because the team balancer cannot match us against other teams easily. I would even wait longer for a match in that case, rather than be broken up.
As for 3rd party comms, that is what it is. Some people will prefer Discord to in-game VOIP. EA DICE is extremely limited on what they can do about that.
@carsono311 Then you opinion of me is wrong.
You ask me if I want team play, while you want your friends together so you can rampage over everyone else and call that team play. There is more to team then your friends. .
My point about in games comms is not Voip there are other ways which DICE have ignored.
