I genuinely love AoW

I'm glad you are enjoying it.

For me, 128 player breakthrough is a mess and the 128 player maps would be better played with 64 players.

---

@Noodlesocks wrote:

I'm glad you are enjoying it.

For me, 128 player breakthrough is a mess and the 128 player maps would be better played with 64 players.

---

Agreed with that, 128 has just been such a cluster with seemingly zerg-like movements of people going from point to point. 

---

@Noodlesocks wrote:

I'm glad you are enjoying it.

For me, 128 player breakthrough is a mess and the 128 player maps would be better played with 64 players.

---

That's a shame, 128 player breakthrough is currently my favourite mode. Not sure why I love the chaos of the massive battles so much but I do lol 

---

@Noodlesocks wrote:

I'm glad you are enjoying it.

For me, 128 player breakthrough is a mess and the 128 player maps would be better played with 64 players.

---

Much agreed @Noodlesocks ,

Though sad as those geographic large maps could and should have catered perfectly fine to a 128 player mode!

But the culprit is simply the much cheap discounted bare-bones scraping the barrel version we have now of all the BF2042 maps...

They are simply barren of contents and empty for any soul or fun across the vast majority of the geography they stretches across.  So at most we just have a few hundred meters around/near each contested flag zone where we have some contents to use for strategic gameplay and exchanges with our friends and foes in the game.

A real downer for us that have known the greatness of many past BF games and epic maps in those which cater to endless variations of battle strategy/approach and long lasting fun...!