@Stew360 wrote:
@-DFA-Thump
The game is still pretty stable across all platform 24/7 so if you hate the game so much why are you even bothering on its forums every single day ?
I dont like fornite and you wont find a single post from me on fortnite forums !
This was is 100X times more stable and in a better state than BF4 or BF3 or BFV at release regardless of Opinions on design or whatever .. the game is highly functional on Any PC that are mid end PC of the last 5 years or so ..
Anything below that will indeed run the game at barely 30 to 45 fps wich is to be expected .. Also many peoples dont even understand what is a XMP profile or how important it is to have low latency fast ram especially with games like this having a 2133 Mhz ram versus having 3200mhz CL16 ram will get you from minus 50 fps to over 80 fps with a 3600 AMD processor wich were 160$ processor lol
So yeah we can say whatever but the reality is millions of players still play this game across all platform .. wich would never translate to millions players in concurents across 24 hours ..
I played about 2 hours today so i was in the concurent players for about 2 hours not more and most players on any battlefield games 50% + plays around 20 to 40 hours total then never played the game after that ..then 35 % + plays 40 to 80 hours before they stop and a fringe minority play more than 100 hours in any BF tittle ever .. If we had steam version numbers for BF4 when it came out youd see i am right lol
BFBC2 was on steam but we have no data from 2010 era but i can garante just by looking at the stats that most peoples didnt played much .. I am still ranked 600 ish in the world in Bad company 1 and i have stopped playing it compleatly after 780hours about 1 year after launch
Ive stopped playing BF3 after few hundreads hours , BF4 ive stopped playing for 1 years directly after launch because it was unplayable so i played planetside 2 and firefall instead wich was much better . and then retried it for few weeks after the august patch the next year ...
Most peoples buy games play for 2 weeks or so then stop playing that game and go to another its the way things work ..
Exeption being MMOs , Uber competitive established fps with wishes to become " pro " or else .. Or live services games like destiny , or even BR like Apex legends , Warzone etc.. wich drop contents that draw back quitters to come back play the game again . Generating Hype all the time
BF 2042 cannot be that game yet but might be .. Yet BF2042 remain the best ever BF combine arms game ever made and 128 players conquest was long due 256 would be even better .. But the main problems is DICE did not manage to create a proper Team structure with Commander , Platoon leaders , Squad leaders , Proximity VOIP , Command VOIP , etc.. wich make 128 players match feel unorganised , chaotics and cooperation is very hard to pull off whithin the team .. They maintained thew Bad company 1 12 vs 12s 4 man squad centric structure . Wich only create squad individualism and does not make anyones feel like they belong in a team
@Stew360 wrote:
@-DFA-Thump
The game is still pretty stable across all platform 24/7 so if you hate the game so much why are you even bothering on its forums every single day ?
I dont like fornite and you wont find a single post from me on fortnite forums !
This was is 100X times more stable and in a better state than BF4 or BF3 or BFV at release regardless of Opinions on design or whatever .. the game is highly functional on Any PC that are mid end PC of the last 5 years or so ..
Anything below that will indeed run the game at barely 30 to 45 fps wich is to be expected .. Also many peoples dont even understand what is a XMP profile or how important it is to have low latency fast ram especially with games like this having a 2133 Mhz ram versus having 3200mhz CL16 ram will get you from minus 50 fps to over 80 fps with a 3600 AMD processor wich were 160$ processor lol
So yeah we can say whatever but the reality is millions of players still play this game across all platform .. wich would never translate to millions players in concurents across 24 hours ..
I played about 2 hours today so i was in the concurent players for about 2 hours not more and most players on any battlefield games 50% + plays around 20 to 40 hours total then never played the game after that ..then 35 % + plays 40 to 80 hours before they stop and a fringe minority play more than 100 hours in any BF tittle ever .. If we had steam version numbers for BF4 when it came out youd see i am right lol
BFBC2 was on steam but we have no data from 2010 era but i can garante just by looking at the stats that most peoples didnt played much .. I am still ranked 600 ish in the world in Bad company 1 and i have stopped playing it compleatly after 780hours about 1 year after launch
Ive stopped playing BF3 after few hundreads hours , BF4 ive stopped playing for 1 years directly after launch because it was unplayable so i played planetside 2 and firefall instead wich was much better . and then retried it for few weeks after the august patch the next year ...
Most peoples buy games play for 2 weeks or so then stop playing that game and go to another its the way things work ..
Exeption being MMOs , Uber competitive established fps with wishes to become " pro " or else .. Or live services games like destiny , or even BR like Apex legends , Warzone etc.. wich drop contents that draw back quitters to come back play the game again . Generating Hype all the time
BF 2042 cannot be that game yet but might be .. Yet BF2042 remain the best ever BF combine arms game ever made and 128 players conquest was long due 256 would be even better .. But the main problems is DICE did not manage to create a proper Team structure with Commander , Platoon leaders , Squad leaders , Proximity VOIP , Command VOIP , etc.. wich make 128 players match feel unorganised , chaotics and cooperation is very hard to pull off whithin the team .. They maintained thew Bad company 1 12 vs 12s 4 man squad centric structure . Wich only create squad individualism and does not make anyones feel like they belong in a team
You certainly never played BF3 or BF4, BF3 was very stable compared to the disastrous launch of bf4 and now 2042
no this game doesn’t have million of players, not even remotely close.
in every game at non-peak hours you have to wait in Q so the Gane can finally start, get a lot of AI in your or the enemy Team (or both)
if you turn crosplay off you can’t literally not play anymore on PC.
but you obviously never have done that.
the console sausages are the reason why this game is still alive on PC, not becouse this Game is flawless and perfect. Less copium please
and in case you still didn’t noticed, the conceptual design of 128 players is one of the reasons this game is so unpredictable, together with those open maps and the failing netcode it is simply not fun for ALOT of players and the Data back this up.
but yeah everything is fine 🤡
@Bolvard
I think i was certainly there when BF3 launch , while it was more stable than BF4 for sure it still had a pletora of issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nxkYhs5IZVU
But indeed BF3 was playable at launch so was BF2042 when it launch on the 19 the pre release was more sketchy and felt more like BF3 beta type of thing lol ..
That said i played 500 hours almost already in 2042 and the game was pretty good overall and way more stable than BF4 or BFV months after launch ... BF2042 most oustanding issue were fixed in the first week and ppoor balance decision made after so call " community member " were whining that AR were to " accurate " and said they were lazerbeam and needed to be more innacurate lol Even tho BF4 had the most lazer accurate gun there is .. DICE once again listen to the " community feedback " and paid for it ... Everyones were trashing the game because AR were basically unusable ...
There is no ones saying the game is flawless but sorry to disapoint you but Planetside 2 is very alive on my server Emerald and the steam charts numbers of concurent players are 10 times less than BF2042 and there is no crossplay with consoles in planetside and BF2042 only need 64 to 128 players per match ..if you had steam + Epic + origin numbers it will be well over 30K + concurent players on PC only at every hours in the day so if you add consoles to this it goes well over 60 to 70k if we are conservative with our numbers
You cannot get linked with peoples who have corssplay on .. so as soon as you turn it off you are linked with the only peopples who turned it off .. If the matchmaking was made that anyones could be link in any games as long as they dont have another platform in their lobby you would more easily find games with PC only or consoles only
But its not how it work ,, either you are crossplay matchmaking or Platform specific
ALSO THE ONLY REASON why you dont find much match with crossplay off is simply because the vast majority of players turn crossplay on .. And almost no ones neither consoles or PC turn crossplay off because they want to play with their friends on any platforms .. thats why mate
