Forum Discussion
RMEChief
4 years agoLegend
I like the idea, but man, they couldn't even get 128 players to work right. Could you imagine how bad a 256 player experience would be?
After this debacle, I expect them to go back to 64 player game modes.
kregora
4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@Adamonic Part of the 128-player issues is "one squad can't do anything".
Part of this issue is, that a squad is max 4 players. So in BF4 a single squad could very much dominate the game. But one squad in a 64 player mode was 15% of a team, or 8% of a match.
In BF2042 a single squad is 6% of the team or 3% of the match.
What we need is bigger if not much bigger squads as we have now.
Part of this issue is, that a squad is max 4 players. So in BF4 a single squad could very much dominate the game. But one squad in a 64 player mode was 15% of a team, or 8% of a match.
In BF2042 a single squad is 6% of the team or 3% of the match.
What we need is bigger if not much bigger squads as we have now.
- 4 years ago
agree, A platoon of 8, consisting of 2 Squad of 4, with 1 of the 8 guy as the platoon leader.
And when the squad conquer or hold a certain number of zone and maybe combined with # of kills, could have access to a wave of A-10 Warhog air support.
But we want, or at least, I would prefer to have a platoon system rather than small 4 people squad.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,111 PostsLatest Activity: 2 hours ago
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago
- 3 hours ago
- 4 hours ago
Portal battlefield 2042
Solved4 hours ago