@VBALL_MVP Let me try to word it better. A similar game to an already released game that was released within the last 1-2 years. So for example, Firestorm released like 6 months to a year after BLOPS 4 Warzone. Or maybe they want to make a hero shooter br for example from what it sounds like in the video. Lets say they make one and release it a year after Apex 2. Those two have already cemented themselves into the genre and if they wanted to compete, releasing a half-assed game in an overflowing br market and expecting it to be a hit is silly imo. They back peddled many times in this development chasing trends, and in doing so lost a lot of their core playerbase as well as the new players they were trying to bring in due to the lack of depth the game has from its short actual development time.
Of course we don't want games to be exactly like the old one but the designs and core fundamentals are the same with the addition of what current technology can do now a days. (weather effects for example) They wont be the same as a game from 10 years ago (bf3/4/bc2)
I am sure if they did release something similar to BF3 & 4 people would be bitching nonetheless saying we want something different!
@CantGetRight Maybe, maybe not. But there has always been a loyal fanbase for 3 and 4 and a lot of those people will definitely pick it up. Add that with the marketing they did for this game (at least with the first few trailers) They'd probably still bring in the new players they were targeting and add portal to it and it would be a solid game. The market has been itching in anticipation for a large modern shooter, we saw that with the build up to this release.
@CantGetRight Yeah and it ended up being the best selling bf I think. It had a loyal fanbase, solid foundation and brought a lot of new players to the series
Definitely true!
Although righteously the game should be in favour of the OG BF lovers whom played BF3 & BF4, and not the next-gen kids all hooked on COD and think BF1 & 2 are awesome.
"Although righteously the game should be in favour of the OG BF lovers whom played BF3 & BF4, and not the next-gen kids all hooked on COD and think BF1 & 2 are awesome"
Why should it be like BF3 and BF4 to please "OG battlefield lovers"? If anything it should be WW2 like the original. Not that I would personally like want that as I have played too many WW2 era shooters already, but your statement doesn't really make sense tbh
REMOVE THE STUPID SPECIALISTS! EVERYONE HATES THE SPECIALISTS!!!
Go back to regular classes NOT specialists!!!
@CountSero wrote:
@ragnarok013 I think many people don't like it to open more than one launcher to playing a game, also you could get BF2042 much cheaper on origin itself and thru key sellers than on steam. So, I think there is a valid argument that Steam beside Epic are the smallest portion here.
@CountSero some yes, but it's the Origin thin client so it's not as resource intensive as the full Origin clients and many other AAA companies also mandate their launchers too like Ubisoft, Rockstar and so on so it's not a deal breaker for most Steam users. Steam still dwarfs those other companies sales to the point where Ubisoft doesn't even sell the latest AC on Steam to get more money because most people still bought AC on Steam.
