Until I see a real anti-cheat, Server Browser, Persistent Servers and other missing features I'm not interested.
I'll base everything off the beta. I'm going to treat the beta as the finished product we'll get at release.
I feel the need to point out that prior to BF2042 we were told they were going back to BF4. So don't be surprised if this is not true!
@cso7777True, especially since they said they have been playing the new game nearly daily for well over a year already (their own words), you'd expect by the time the play-test comes there are no more excuses.
I remain cautious, I won't pre-order and I also won't buy at launch. I want to see the reviews of critics and players first before I consider buying.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.
Hope for real gameplay in trailer as well.
@Lady_One wrote:
@OskooI_007While I doubt this will happen again, I think it's worth noting that the 2042 open beta was better than release - in the beta spread was okish, however they probably overcorrected to critique of guns being too accurate and made almost everything so inaccurate that you couldn't hit anyone past spitting distance.
I don't know about that, the open beta was all over the place. Although I will admit I had fun doing some bunny hopping with McKay before that got nerfed, lol.
The guns in 2042 have been the most-lasery guns I can recall in the series. A good majority of the automatic weapons allow you to maintain aim while firing up to medium range without requiring micro-bursts (like in BF4) and guns would get out of control pretty quickly in BF1 and BF5.
We don't know yet when the playtest will be and what it will look like, but for those who are interested in potentially participating here's a useful link where you can signup for future EA Playtests: https://www.ea.com/playtesting
@Anobix wrote:
@Lady_One wrote:
@OskooI_007While I doubt this will happen again, I think it's worth noting that the 2042 open beta was better than release - in the beta spread was okish, however they probably overcorrected to critique of guns being too accurate and made almost everything so inaccurate that you couldn't hit anyone past spitting distance.I don't know about that, the open beta was all over the place. Although I will admit I had fun doing some bunny hopping with McKay before that got nerfed, lol.
The guns in 2042 have been the most-lasery guns I can recall in the series. A good majority of the automatic weapons allow you to maintain aim while firing up to medium range without requiring micro-bursts (like in BF4) and guns would get out of control pretty quickly in BF1 and BF5.
I mean you can just spray with some LMGs and they feel like lasers to me
@GrizzGolf wrote:
@Anobix wrote:
@Lady_One wrote:
@OskooI_007While I doubt this will happen again, I think it's worth noting that the 2042 open beta was better than release - in the beta spread was okish, however they probably overcorrected to critique of guns being too accurate and made almost everything so inaccurate that you couldn't hit anyone past spitting distance.I don't know about that, the open beta was all over the place. Although I will admit I had fun doing some bunny hopping with McKay before that got nerfed, lol.
The guns in 2042 have been the most-lasery guns I can recall in the series. A good majority of the automatic weapons allow you to maintain aim while firing up to medium range without requiring micro-bursts (like in BF4) and guns would get out of control pretty quickly in BF1 and BF5.
I mean you can just spray with some LMGs and they feel like lasers to me
Was going to say the same thing, the first couple weapons I T1d were the LCMG and the PKP, they were practically assault rifles with 200 round magazines. And the K30 was bananas at the start as well for almost all ranges.
