Forum Discussion
Game development is not cheap. Engine upgrades, paying developers and console license fees, marketing....all of this stuff is crazy expensive and producing game is risky even for big publishers like EA.
There are plenty of unethical things I can point to that EA does but they are related to quality: bugs, balance, anti cheat and occasionally network issues. If you want to argue that quality and refinement, historically speaking, doesn't justify the price then we can find common ground on that.
But most people aren't coming from that angle. They're arguing from a content standpoint. To them, a game with 50 garbage maps and 100 trash weapons is better than one with 10 quality maps and 30 well balanced weapons. Such thinking will only encourage developers to pump out half baked content so they can boast about the volume of content players are getting.
On the flip side you have people making fun of players with 1000 hours saying a game is bad. Again it's not about the sheer number of hours its about the quality. What if a large amount of those 1000 hours were spend in frustration dealing with crashes, bugs and balance issues? What if the player just stuck around because they devs kept saying "don't worry, next patch will be fixed" only to see them break something else even more severely? What if the player would just jump to a competitor but can't because that's the only game in its specific genre?
Bottom line is that its about the quality and value being delivered. Why this is such an esoteric concept is beyond me. Ultimately you need to judge for yourself once you have had the chance to play it. Do the graphics, sound design, gameplay and content justify the price I paid?
For me personally, yes in theory it does. There is so much we don't know yet though and then we have to see if they can actually execute better than they have in the past.
@rainkloud
Didn't see the justification for the price increase myself so I sold my Xbox Series X. Battlefield 2042 being more expensive on Xbox Series X than PC was the tipping point with my decision.
- 5 years ago@Popa2caps Terrible use of sarcasm.
- Anonymous5 years ago
@HattoriHanzo420
i wasn't being sarcastic. Nothing I stated about selling the Xbox Series X or the reason was a joke.- 5 years ago
I like it how people say it is too expensive, and that strange line of saying 1% of cost of license ? What license ? I dont buy license, I buy a product. Corporates wont twist my language. They surely wish, but them saying things dont make them true.
In theory, you should not even have to bother once the product is finished on time with bugs and what not. I am not responsible for corporate leadership having extremely high targets for (CEO and similar, I do not know them in person or anything, corporate culture puts too much stuff in one guy at others expense) profits, not really margins to speak of. I am not responsible for them not finishing and not testing the game enough pre-release.
I am fully in right to keep my personal data without it being sent to any entity that I dont even know about. When I buy something, it does not have any right to force me online, regardless of them wishing so. If laws are too weak against such forceful exploitation, the only other option is to beat corporates with the only thing they feel - the money, the fear of not getting more of it, they call it a loss, Im almost at a loss at such perverted wording. They are really shaking in terror about money. But they project an image of confidence, how is all gonna happen good for them. Saying, wishing, all that, does not make it true still. BFV debacle serves as an example. It was gonna be all the x y z, cool words, and then the lie (the great projections) deflated. I was watching the balloon grow big, then have hydrogen go boom. Big balloon got deflated and dwarfed. Not the first time, apparently, not last either.
More than 10 years ago there was a kind of intrusive DRM that prevented people from reselling their game. (on DVDs) 3 installs, finished. I guess it was unlawful, or causing too much outrage so they approached intrusion in different ways. Constant surveillance cause you bought their product ? On certain propaganda outlets I would expect 'CCP would be proud', or more like, actually, CCCP would be proud :P Or Stasi/KGB/CIA/NSA and other 'famous' institutions. Building a brighter future, with a straight face. RA3 game came with such stuff as well, I did not buy it until much later on on Steam and for much less. I did not participate in betatesting after release.
How come are companies making you free betatesters, not only free, but you paying for the game in the first place ? Some companies have mastered this art of not just from paying people to test, to getting the game for free for testing, to even have people pay actual extra for beta access. That is outright upside down lol. And those companies make it look like it is normal. Surely, one thing is doing the testing voluntarily, using your machinery, your electricity, your internet that you pay for.
Game development is expensive, so is there anybody like me buying bfme 2 expansion only to learn that it was a mistake that EA never bothered to patch because it was released in terrible state ? 1 patch after 5-6 months didnt fix that much. I felt completely ripped and I think I was. But then I was younger and I was not expecting evil behavior by default.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 4 hours ago
- 6 hours ago
- 7 hours ago