Forum Discussion
@AristarhUcolov2 wrote:It's simple. [NO-FORCED-INTERNET-CONNECTION]
P.S Battlefield was single and multiplayer during the 2000s era.
The direction consoles are heading, you need the internet to play anything, even single player. I can't imagine the size of the hard drive needed to privately run such huge maps and 128 players with everything else going on. Just doesn't seem feasible. That's like hosting a professional football game in your backyard and expecting 50,000 people to fit on your property.
@ZombieP1ow I see your point. If they did some sort of offline mode, I’d assume it would be on a small map with less players
- 5 years ago
I think there should be a little offline mode, like 10vs10 or something. You know a little arena for warmup/practise (if thats your thing). Though no progression there...little timmy will have to put on his bigboys pants, and get on the battlefield for that!
Id also really like a sort of gun range, with multiple targets (some moving), at multiple ranges.
But you dont always get what you want, and im fine with that.
- 5 years ago@Goinggrey123 Better 64 to 64.