Forum Discussion
521 Replies
Sure @EA_Atic ,
Look forward to getting more details officially confirmed on this Hazard Zone squad-based battle royale mashup! :o)
- Trokey664 years agoSeasoned Ace
@lzilchetl wrote:
@AristarhUcolov2 wrote:
@Its_Travis_199
It turns out ........ back to 2010 (Boring time without offline bots = () This is no longer considered a gift for fans. Since all fans dreamed of offline Conquest. For this, Battlefield was famous in the 00s. Single-player mode in Conquest ...We needed Offline Conquest.I never. Never even thought of it. So that's all fans -1.
-2 and I strongly suspect a lot more too.
@Trokey66 wrote:
@lzilchetl wrote:
@AristarhUcolov2 wrote:
@Its_Travis_199
It turns out ........ back to 2010 (Boring time without offline bots = () This is no longer considered a gift for fans. Since all fans dreamed of offline Conquest. For this, Battlefield was famous in the 00s. Single-player mode in Conquest ...We needed Offline Conquest.I never. Never even thought of it. So that's all fans -1.
-2 and I strongly suspect a lot more too.
-3, and counting... BF is famous for its large scale multiplayer world with infantry and vehicles. All the single player parts from the past were at best terribly mediocre, all bolted on as limited add-ons.
- Jesse1654 years agoSeasoned Ace
I think the Bot Matches are better than the Campaigns because they give Infinite Replayability.
Meanwhile the Campaigns were only good once and then pointless after that.
- ChrisAWJBethel4 years agoSeasoned Ace@EA_Atic Sir/Ma'am, I think it would be beneficial to everyone if DICE/SEED/Criterion/Motive repeated the steps they took to included offline bots in Star Wars Battlefront II. I was thinking they could have a lower cap of 32-40 for last gen systems like BFII. Progression could be toggled on/off, and the maps could be shrunk accordingly to accommodate for the last-gen hardware. I urge you to reconsider your stance on the AI Soldiers in Battlefield 2042, not just for me, but for all the gamers who can't afford Xbox Live Gold/PlayStation Plus or can't afford a decent Internet connection.
- @AristarhUcolov2 I have to agree, I'm not one to play offline but buying the game should allow me to play how I want to play. I understand my stats wouldn't follow me when I'm offline to prevent some type of cheating. But having fun in a game no matter if your online or offline should not be forced to be online only. I remember playing MAG on PS3. After the game server's went offline my disc became a drink coaster from that point on. It's not good to kill off a game after it's life cycle. Allow it to have offline play to continue the life of the game for many decades beyond.
- @lzilchetl Well ... google transalte is misinterpreting my thoughts. And there is no time to check for the correct translation. I mean "All old gamers people dreamed of offline Conquest".
- @Trokey66 Well ... google transalte is misinterpreting my thoughts. And there is no time to check for the correct translation. I mean "All old gamers people dreamed of offline Conquest".
- @CyberDyme From 2002 to 2006, battlefield was considered single player with Offline Conquest and multiplayer with Multiplayer. Single-user mode was considered as a test (after which the person went online) well, or a demo version. Similarity to Present-Test-Game-Demo
- @YT_Positive Offline mode (For many, offline multiplayer) was much better. At the same time, the game lives much longer (According to the ideas, it is infinite) even now BF1942 is live and there is also online.