Forum Discussion
4 years ago
@Trokey66 Seeing how you pointed to the woods from that picture and claimed that as cover, I don't know how else I could address your point other than with the same material. Seeing their current map designs and lack of thought as it relates to flow and gameplay, I am about 99.69% sure my interpretation of their intent is more accurate than yours.
Trokey66
4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@-DFA-Thump you have never heard the phrase "can't see the wood for the tress" I take it?
- 4 years ago
@Trokey66The phrase is "can't see the forest through the trees." If you're going to be condescending, at least be right. Also, what did you even mean by that? Were you being tongue in cheek about it?
- Trokey664 years agoSeasoned Ace
@-DFA-ThumpYou're 'murican aren't you?
Silly question, of course you are otherwise you would know that the rest of the world may not follow your version of simplified English.
I did used the correct term as I am from the UK.
There was a splash of sarcasm, a pinch of irony and yes, a modicum of 'tongue in cheek' but over all, my point still stands.....
You took one look at that picture, saw a few details you didn't like and made an assumption the prevents you from seeing the wood for the trees.- 4 years ago@Trokey66 Too many Brit friends to take a shot at your nation bud, but I could easily say the same as it is specific to British English phrasing (not "the rest of the world"). To address the point at hand as far as the map is concerned. Tell me how you look at that and not see just more open terrain combat where it is a green version of Breakaway?