Forum Discussion
It's not necessarily a bad thinf to have more of a break between titles - I remember it feeling like BF4 was announced practically at 3's launch.
This should hopefully allow the devs to introduce updates to 2042 akin to BF1's CTE -- test out wacky ideas like platoons, special weapons, going heavy on certain stats/mechanics etc.
My whole thought is that this is a whole new team so who knows what we will end up with! This concerns me greatly.
- Raajakaarti_Tero2 years agoSeasoned Vanguard
If it doesn't have good Battlefield philosophy behind how it's made, then I will skip it. Thanks for Battle(non)sense clearing up why Battlefield these days is an repetitive egoshooter which gets you bored of it. Hell Let Loose and Insurgency Sandstorm has way better gameloop to grab your attention and passion.
I'm sorry if this sounds provoking but I feel and think Battlefield has gone long transformation route to become living dead...
- Adamonic2 years agoLegend
@sk1lld wrote:My whole thought is that this is a whole new team so who knows what we will end up with! This concerns me greatly.
Yeah, this is not the same core devs who actually played Battlefield. We now have a crew that has just played 2042, maybe some BFV, but that was released 6 years ago and at least 7 before the next game launches (since BFV).
I am sure they will keep Specialists, maybe make them by faction, and then add the ability to customize them with lipstick and nail polish. That is the way this is trending. We have to make sure there is a Specialist from every demographic and every map has to be from a country that has not yet been represented.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 2 hours ago
- 5 hours ago
- 8 hours ago
The time has come
Solved2 days ago