Forum Discussion
Anobix
1 year agoSeasoned Ace
@CPU_UK I imagine because 64 has long-been the standard player count of most battlefield's and it was easier for them to just double the count instead of adding by 50%.
Maybe 96 would have a better feel to it, but honestly no matter the player count (16v16, 32v32, 50v50, 64v64, etc) the maps and gameplay design and flow are all incredibly important for have everything feel smooth/right. It doesn't matter how good the gunplay is if the maps are just open fields or hills, and similarly you can have perfect/nostalgia-filled maps, but it doesn't help if the gunplay and balance isn't there.
Maybe 96 would have a better feel to it, but honestly no matter the player count (16v16, 32v32, 50v50, 64v64, etc) the maps and gameplay design and flow are all incredibly important for have everything feel smooth/right. It doesn't matter how good the gunplay is if the maps are just open fields or hills, and similarly you can have perfect/nostalgia-filled maps, but it doesn't help if the gunplay and balance isn't there.
sk1lld
1 year agoLegend
I was hoping that the stadium map would release with season 7 but it's fine if it comes later imho.
- VOLBANKER_PC1 year agoSeasoned Ace
@sk1lldI’m also okay with stadium map coming later in the season.
Tbh I prefer getting one new map at a time instead of 4 as back in the days with DLC’s. That means everybody’s focus is on playing that same map instead of bring spread over 4 different maps.Edit:
Btw. I think the stadium map will rock!!!