Forum Discussion
4 years ago
@Fringerunner I don't hate the specialists. Just certain small things about the way they are. That's my issue. Like certain abilities, balance issues, skin issues. Ammo, medic, etc, markers on top of them.
Small things.
I will play all of the modes but Portal will be my favourite, I already know.
And that is true, people will judge main mode on its merit.
Small things.
I will play all of the modes but Portal will be my favourite, I already know.
And that is true, people will judge main mode on its merit.
Fringerunner
4 years agoSeasoned Ace
@TheFireOfTitan No worries, my post wasn't written to dismiss your views, just a general observation/counterpoint.
I've got my own concerns about core, not begrudging anyone else theirs (or anyone for liking what they've seen for that matter).
Everyone's got their own subjective take, hopefully between core or portal, now that we've got some actual information on the latter, those looking for some kind of BF experience should be able to find something they can enjoy.
Still fairly certain HZ isn't aimed at old battlefield players, but we'll see 🙂
I've got my own concerns about core, not begrudging anyone else theirs (or anyone for liking what they've seen for that matter).
Everyone's got their own subjective take, hopefully between core or portal, now that we've got some actual information on the latter, those looking for some kind of BF experience should be able to find something they can enjoy.
Still fairly certain HZ isn't aimed at old battlefield players, but we'll see 🙂
- RaginSam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@Fringerunner What’s old to you? I’ve been playing BF since the release of BFBC2 and I’m really looking forward to HZ. Currently my favorite games are Apex and BF5.
I don’t really like Tarkov, but I love the concept of it. EFT feels really clunky, slow, and convoluted to me. So a battlefield version is really exciting to me, if that’s what it’s going to be.- Fringerunner4 years agoSeasoned Ace@RaginSam 1942? I mean, it had nothing to do with my point, but if you want a numerical answer, there you go even though it has no real value.
The point was those that preferred when battlefield was fine with it's own identity and added new game modes and experiments as DLC rather than try to copy what made other games successful and throw that into the core game at launch, a trend which arguably started with 4.
(i never minded the BC series, i even quite liked 2 though i saw it much like hardline, it's own thing)
I put quite a lot of time into 4 despite some early misgivings about weapons feeling generic vs 3 (3/4/2142 would probably be my favorites if i take off the nostalgia glasses regarding 1942/2), but 1 had a significantly lower time investment, and BF5 lost me within half a year or so and i'm not much of a fan to this day for a variety of reasons.
I'm not even going to talk about the battlefront games.
I did take some pains to point out i don't begrudge anyone their own preferences, but since you seem to have latched on to me not seeing HZ fitting into what i (subjectively) see as a BF game, i'll simply say i don't particularly care for them shoving carbon copies of other games' draws into BF's core, and/or slapping the franchise name on things that have little to nothing to do with "classic" BF without making it a branch title (like BC or Hardline)
If i want to play division's dark zone/tarkov/BR/hero shooter games I'll simply go play them, and i expect a certain formula when buying a BF game that's not really tied to those.
(that doesn't mean all change is bad, but 1 and 5 for instance did not work for me. Subjectively)
As i pointed out repeatedly before though, i also don't mind them throwing something like HZ in when i can simply opt out, though it's arguable that the specialists *obviously* made for HZ being thrown into the core game deviates from that preference, but i'm still going to actually play the finished product before i decide if it's a detriment or not, much like 1 and 5.
All that said, you seem to like the HZ concept so maybe that is the way forward for Dice and i'm in the minority, it's still just two slightly opposed viewpoints on a forum for now and time will tell either way.
And the only consequence of me not enjoying core or HZ is that i don't play them, or if portal also fails to scratch the itch, 2042 as a whole.
No bitterness or anything behind that, sometimes people simply don't like games for all kinds of subjective reasons, much like why i don't play Apex, CoD, or Overwatch. (just to throw some examples out there. Note that i didn't say they were bad games, just that i don't like them).- Natetendo834 years agoNew Hotshot
I think Portal is going to be very popular, but I don't see it killing the other modes. It will for sure be the place for people who don't want specialists, but All Out Warfare will still have a playerbase.
- 4 years ago@Fringerunner Yep. HZ is something new. It's not for old players. But I would play it honestly, if it looks good. 🙂
- RaginSam4 years agoSeasoned Ace@TheFireOfTitan How is it not for old players? Kinda close minded?
- 4 years ago
@RaginSamNothing close minded about that. Don't judge anyone with a single line.
It's something new. I haven't seen many "old BF players" saying they enjoy Tarkov a lot or even Hunt. Hazard Zone is similar to that. Nothing wrong with it, but its not everyone's cup of tea. If I wanted a hardcore gameplay, I will play Squad anyday. And Battlefield for fun.
But I am personally looking forward to playing it, specialists make sense a lot when you think of Hazard Zone.