Rate This Game 1-10
Rate Battlefield 2042 on the rating scale 1-10
1 - is very bad
10 - is exelent
just only rate
Forum Discussion
89 Replies
At release it whas 3/10, after the patches it´s a 4.
When al is fixed it might go up to a 6 but not higher than that.
6.8 - based on my enjoyment factor at the moment.
That will go down rapidly without more and better maps as repetition and boredom set in...
0 - It's an engine template, not a game.
10/10
I have fun with it
@Equilibrium_82barely pushing a 2.
Terrible sound design, worst out of any previous BF game.
Specialists system ruined 2042, pulling the core from Battlefield.
No sense of immersion.
Goofy, cringy voiceovers end game and throughout matches.
Lack of detail. [Game takes place in a post-apocalyptic setting, maps should reflect that]
Minimal destruction.
Player movement is too fast, weightless.
Gunplay is sluggish, unpolished.
Specialists character models are bland.
Terrible map design.
The unlockable skins are goofy and reflect too much of a CoD skin.
Music and soundtracks are terrible. [BF1 has some of the best]
Lack of launch content, weapons, maps, customization.
Removing specialists, bringing back classes and allowing for complete character customization [similar to BFV] would bump rating to about a 4/10
Only gave it a rating of 2 because I did have some fun before I refunded the game.
Took that money and bought Battlefield 1.
- @Equilibrium_82 2 or 3.
Too many of the core is gone. Basic features like ingame scoreboard, squad management system, voip, joining on friends etc. is all missing. Maps feel soulless, bland and empty. No atmosphere, no immersion. Cringe voiclines, cringe specialists, no class system.
The game is a horrible mistake. A solid 3
- -10
1 - 10 = - 9
This Fps 20-40 Field is not Battlefield
Call it stutterfield , bugfield or walking simulator and i will give it a higher score ( maybe 0,5 / 10 )
p.s im playing Battlefield since year 2002
