@TheseusJason написал (-а):
@flcrmI also play only Breakthrough and Rush (I cannot stand Conquest for the same reasons as you mentioned) and I regularly get scores like those you screenshot'ed; and I certainly don't cheat. On a very good match I can get 70 to 80 kills and die between 10 to 20 times. And I do not consider myself to be a top player.
Signs of cheating, to me, are very obvious: E.S.P., wallhacking and statistical imbalance towards headshots.
BFV is rife with it; 2042 I can count with my hands the number of times I perceived it—not many.
As a result, he had more than 100 kills. I also sometimes did something like 85/15, but very rarely. So don't tell me what 100/6 can do without cheats. To make a lot of kills, you need to actively rush. But this entails a large number of deaths, because a large number of people sit in ambush and wait for you to run past to shoot you in the back or you can get caught in the crossfire.
The main thing in the cheats is not an aimbot at all, but a wallhack, because you can see all the enemies and you can choose such a route to kill everyone one by one without being accidentally killed from an ambush or under crossfire. And aimbot is an add-on for the very crooked. If you do not understand the elementary, then it is clear that you will not see any cheats and abnormal k/d ratio will not make you think.
P.S. What statistical imbalance in the direction of headshots do you consider to be an indicator of the use of an aimbot?
P.P.S. If there is a free cheat and the anti-cheat does not work, how many people are there who are ready to cheat? That's right, a lot. I see them regularly.