@sk1lld
I do not know, even as someone mediocre at sniping I got like 78% headshot ratio on the Gol Magnum. Enders has like 81% HS ratio on his best gun so I guess one can do get suspicious of a 96% when a competitive player is at like 15% less. though he may be a smurf account
44% accuracy is not that weird for a sniper rifle though.
I got 71% accuracy on the XCE Bar and 63% on the Gol Magnum.
@UP_Hawxxeye
The way spread works in this game is only one in 5 bullets goes on target so you would expect ~ 25% accuracy and not much higher you add this guy's 43% accuracy with the 96% HS and you got an impossible "Purchased" ability.
JMHO
@VOLBANKER_PC wrote:
@UP_HawxxeyeHe’s got 82% HS with VHX-D3 ;-)
Case closed…!
I had to look up and compare with what is normal for other players and I have to agree that this is quite damning
I don't see EA anti-cheat working these days and fell bad about the unstop cheat wave . They start to ruining every game now .
If you want some simple heuristics: all players with at least 200 kills and at the same time >40 HS% for any AR or SMG are cheaters. Plain and simple. Same goes for normal accuracy of >30% for AR/SMG, which is not possible. You can't ban players with just 50 kills for the weapon being evaluated as there might be some outliers. But for weapons with 200+ kills, this heuristics is quite robust. Ban all those players. Simple. Why is it not being done, as calling this way simple would still make it sound more complicated than it actually is?
The ONLY reason why those players are not getting banned is BECAUSE EA/DICE DO NOT WANT TO. If there is ANY other explanation that would make sense I would LOVE to hear it.
@ForumUser wrote:If you want some simple heuristics: all players with at least 200 kills and at the same time >40 HS% for any AR or SMG are cheaters. Plain and simple. Same goes for normal accuracy of >30% for AR/SMG, which is not possible. You can't ban players with just 50 kills for the weapon being evaluated as there might be some outliers. But for weapons with 200+ kills, this heuristics is quite robust. Ban all those players. Simple. Why is it not being done, as calling this way simple would still make it sound more complicated than it actually is?
The ONLY reason why those players are not getting banned is BECAUSE EA/DICE DO NOT WANT TO. If there is ANY other explanation that would make sense I would LOVE to hear it.
I do see your logic and agree with it. The problem being, we live in an era where landing accusations is an explosive cocktail. I’m refraining from using the word ‘snowflake mentality’ here, but a sensitive player could argue in courts (if not at least the court of public opinion via social media) that he was banned with no evidence. Any lawyer would fall in heavy at the publishing company involved. Hey, teachers get suspended or even fired for saying the ‘wrong’ words in classes… imagine EA/DICE trying to reason and explain to activist-types “we banned the player because statistics show their gameplay is not realistically possible…”
I wouldn't say they don't care. It's more that cheating in their games isn't seen as a priority. They market the game, sell the game, update the game, then end the game. All while banning and removing cheaters. Then once the game is done they move on from it like a fatherless child
An unpopular view but
Anyone who has their stats on private is suss for me hahaha more so if the gameplay reflects that.
They have the mindset well if they cant see my stats i wont get reported sadly it doesnt work that way.
