Forum Discussion

Re: EA doesn't seem to be keen on anti-cheat

@ForumUserwe need to return to running servers like in old days - where you were admin yourself. Just played BF5 underground 64 player map - private person hosted with rules - no shotgun no mmg - but most important no cheaters. Here the person that hosts the server and map - have the power to kick the cheater. This game was legit from start to end - and what a nice pleassant experience - this map and no cheat. Think BF2042 should be run the same way - vote kick - map votes and all the things we had before.

Very often when I report players I also say I did in common chat so person can see. They ask why and calls me all kinds of things. I explain why and very very often they leave. Would you leave if you did nothing wrong ?
Not sure how steam's VAC ban works - but that is a nasty penalty to get. Anyone know what penalty is here ? Just pop-up saying you are not allowed to play or are you ban'ed from game ? It needs to be a severe slap for it to work.

1 Reply

  • sk1lld's avatar
    sk1lld
    Legend
    2 years ago

    It's almost like their afraid to do what needs to be done. They "EA/DICE" have been like this in all their past titles after BF4. I don't know what to say but it is aggravating to the utmost.

About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion

Discuss the latest news and game information around Battlefield 2042 in the community forums.16,233 PostsLatest Activity: 10 hours ago