@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
I wonder if EA hopes to get less hackusation or stat shaming reports if the players are less sure about what are the stats of others.
@UP_Hawxxeye given the Community's recent concerns in BF5 I wouldn't doubt if this was part of that decision making process.
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@ragnarok013 as too many people see the kills to deaths on the board but forget to consider the medic and squad revives that happen if one plays with a squad that sticks together, which diminishes the total deaths of that squad by a lot
@UP_Hawxxeye I completely agree. A good medic even with a bad KD can really make a huge difference. They should IMO list Kills, deaths, and revives given on the scoreboard in addition to your total score.
@ragnarok013 wrote:
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:
@ragnarok013as too many people see the kills to deaths on the board but forget to consider the medic and squad revives that happen if one plays with a squad that sticks together, which diminishes the total deaths of that squad by a lot@UP_HawxxeyeI completely agree. A good medic even with a bad KD can really make a huge difference. They should IMO list Kills, deaths, and revives given on the scoreboard in addition to your total score.
I like this as an idea.
---
There will be arguments until the end of time about scoreboards but they will never show actual usefulness. Getting a great kd with lots of kills will rarely be a bad thing but those who have been in a game of Ops with a camping Arty truck know what tends to happen.
On the other side of the coin those topping the board zerging going 6/8 but with 100 resupplies really don't "deserve" to be there either.
This isn't really adding much other than to say the scoreboard is definitely needed but it's actual usefulness can be debated.
