Re: Why does no one care about winning anymore

---

@FaTaL_DReaMS1 wrote:
@DPsx7Yes it has been a core of BF that’s how they separate themselves from the worthless shooters

---

Classes isn't what separates BF from other shooters. It's the large scale combined arms gameplay that makes battlefield battlefield. 

---

@FaTaL_DReaMS1 wrote:
@protoman23Wrong when played how it’s supposed to be played BF stands for teamwork not individual performance. Yes large battlefields and ability to control vehicles is also a core BF experience

---

Having restrictive classes does nothing for group play. It gives the illusion of group play to brain dead randoms that probably aren't very good let alone decent at the game in the first place. Social features and expanded group play is how you achieve coordination and team play in battlefield. Battlefield is only ever at its best when its an organized group vs organized group. BF2042 doesn't cater to large scale group play. There's only so much a squad of 4 can do in a match. There's no point in going out of your way to play like a "casual sweat lord" when chances are you'll never play the same players again with the way match making works in AoW. 

The conservative grandad energy in this thread is off the charts.

10/10. Would tell kids to get off my lawn again.

There is more incentive and focus put on leveling up and earning badges than winning so naturally players will gravitate towards that. I'm super competitive/sweaty so it really hurts my soul to see players almost intentionally throwing games and not doing things "properly" but at the end of the day, it's just a game,and I guess I shouldn't be getting so worked up.