Remove the drone like you did with the shield
Just remove the from the game like you did the shield until you fix the ability to put C5 on it. It's not a "fun battlefield mechanic" it's an exploit and a bug and will only get worse as it gets m...
Forum Discussion
As the title says there is no balancing in game if some random guy with the drone and C5 can kill any vehicle or person without any way to counter it, it's frustrating, it's toxic and it's game breaking...
Why the hell did you think that allowing such a thing would be funny or positive for the game?
You want to nerf the heli? Ok but now genius go to nerf even this because this is battlefield NOT THAT CRAP KNOWN AS COD, people that rants for the vehicles should go to play COD instead
[Edit: All caps removed from title - ElliotLH]
@0GRONINIf I was there I would be running Rao to hack and shoot their drones down.
Or I would be flying my own drone to EMP their drones down for others to shoot.
These are two counters that I came up very quickly when I decided I wanted to reduce the enemy drones.
and for the 10th time: The drones are getting nerfed to be easier to see and hit next patch.
Please cease the drama until we can see if that ends up being enough.
If that is not enough, they can be adjusted again.
Unlike a ready and packed weapon like the UCAV, the drone user will be set back a lot each time they get shot down between the drone cooldown, the c5 resupply and the preparation of the next drone
C5 drone spamming is worse than UCAV. And I loved UCAV. I used it mostly as anti littlebird weapon. Tanks in the game are weak as hell already, no need for weapons that kill you instantly without giving any warning.
@Lykosia wrote:C5 drone spamming is worse than UCAV. And I loved UCAV. I used it mostly as anti littlebird weapon. Tanks in the game are weak as hell already, no need for weapons that kill you instantly without giving any warning.
How about focusing on making the tanks better so they can actually correspond to the throngs of infantry they have to deal with then?
