Forum Discussion
RayD_O1
2 years agoHero
@sk1lld
Yeah I agree, I have always been an advocate for getting games started with lower numbers, even one player starts. I think this is the thread you were referring too :
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Reduce-the-number-of-players-needed-to-start-a-round/td-p/12223059
Yeah I agree, I have always been an advocate for getting games started with lower numbers, even one player starts. I think this is the thread you were referring too :
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Reduce-the-number-of-players-needed-to-start-a-round/td-p/12223059
ATFGunr
2 years agoLegend
@RayD_O1 Two years on and we’re still begging, this is getting ridiculous. People are speaking with their wallets and still Dice doesn’t listen. The diminished player count that begs for less restrictions on starts is the other way people are communicating and still Dice doesn’t listen. Will anyone still be playing when S7 comes out?
- RayD_O12 years agoHero@ATFGunr
I agree, we need to spend more time actually playing and less time waiting to play in lobbies.- RanzigeRidder22 years agoLegend
Pondhawk Superiority is another great example, 32 player start for a 64 player server, it takes way too long! Who at Dice comes up with these ideas, and do they analyze any data at all to base these decisions upon?
- GrizzGolf2 years agoSeasoned Ace
Needs to be lower. People would stay if you could just start playing