Remove the minimum amount of players to start a match
So many times a game could start but a few short, Fix.
Forum Discussion
@sk1lld
Yeah I agree, I have always been an advocate for getting games started with lower numbers, even one player starts. I think this is the thread you were referring too :
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Reduce-the-number-of-players-needed-to-start-a-round/td-p/12223059
Yeah I agree, I have always been an advocate for getting games started with lower numbers, even one player starts. I think this is the thread you were referring too :
https://answers.ea.com/t5/General-Discussion/Reduce-the-number-of-players-needed-to-start-a-round/td-p/12223059
@RayD_O1 We have been asking for this for too long. This is a big problem in smaller markets, like Oceania.
It is the middle of the school holidays in Australia, and I struggle to find active games at the best of times. I've given up waiting - I just load another game (Starfield for me).
It is the middle of the school holidays in Australia, and I struggle to find active games at the best of times. I've given up waiting - I just load another game (Starfield for me).
- @Lancelot_du_Lac
I agree, I am sorry to hear that you still struggle to get into games, this should not be happening in a BF title.
The one player start / AI backfill works well in Official Weekly Portal Experiences and imho it would work equally well in AOW.I also advocate for more time in play and less time waiting in empty lobbies.
Just imagine how cool the game could be, if the minimum amount of players to start a match was removed and they added persistent servers in AOW and a server browser.
Featured Places
