Replace Hazard with TDM and/or Rush???
Official TDM and Rush got yanked from Portal recently. Don't be sad, this is just how it works out sometimes! So true Angel, yet please click on "Me Too" and/or "XP" if you think Hazard should be r...
Forum Discussion
@Stew360Hazard Zone is the biggest failure I have ever seen in a game, in recent years. It's filled with bots and people don't give a * about that mode. It's so easy to win (since you are mostly facing bots). Why do you think that HZ has no active players? Sometimes I wait for several minutes to get a match, just to get a clueless team of console players that dies all the time, even to bots.
High stake game mode, yeah right haha. They are even rewarding people with 1000 credits to play one HZ match daily because no players want to play it. They need to rethink this mode entirely.
Rush mode were many times better than Hazard Zone. A battle royale mode would have been better than this garbage. How can you seriously think this mode is good? Joking? Even when I get 50+ kills and get away, it feels boring.
No need to remove HZ, just add Rush.
Rush was more popular than HZ by far.
@Incogn1too_zZz Hazardzone is pretty good and i dont understand the hate to the slightess neither do i understand this trend of hating on BF as if it was " the cool thing " peoples perroting the same non sens that can be debunked in 2 minutes in a conversation with someones like me ..
Thats said Conquest is the core BF mode always has been ... Rush is an add-on mode who made its debut into BFBC1 as " Gold rush " and was made for 12 vs 12 gameplay ...
Thats said
Hazardzone is quiet good in its own right . could it be improoved ? Of course it could .. Could it be more fun ? Of course
I would have liked a " The Division " Darkzone type of thing and vibes with undergroundTunels and subway station and so on it would have been awesome .. But after playing it quiet a bit i can say that the conquest map work pretty well for hazardzone wich is a bit like a mini " Resurgence " battle royal from warzone but with more maps than just rebirth island .. the thing i think is missing from hazardzone is more players 32 players does not cut it for every maps ..and some improovements could be made on other aspect ..
But RUSH is okish at best . and i wouldnt mind if they made it another mode you can choose from in Allout warfare
Thats said Conquest is the core BF mode always has been ... Rush is an add-on mode who made its debut into BFBC1 as " Gold rush " and was made for 12 vs 12 gameplay ...
Thats said
Hazardzone is quiet good in its own right . could it be improoved ? Of course it could .. Could it be more fun ? Of course
I would have liked a " The Division " Darkzone type of thing and vibes with undergroundTunels and subway station and so on it would have been awesome .. But after playing it quiet a bit i can say that the conquest map work pretty well for hazardzone wich is a bit like a mini " Resurgence " battle royal from warzone but with more maps than just rebirth island .. the thing i think is missing from hazardzone is more players 32 players does not cut it for every maps ..and some improovements could be made on other aspect ..
But RUSH is okish at best . and i wouldnt mind if they made it another mode you can choose from in Allout warfare
@Stew360 I have played (and still plays) Battle Royale games. I looked forward to Hazard Zone (from all the hype), however it feels like a poor mans battle royale at best. Big empty maps with mostly bots.
At least have a hardcore HZ mode with no repsawns, no bots etc.
Conquest is another mode that I find boring. Never really liked it. Breakthrough is far better. However it is good to have options and some "weekly quests" were easier to do in Conquest.
Player numbers are dwindling day for day. EA/DICE does not come with a statement or roadmap. I feel the game is dying slowly at this point. It's been over 2 months since release and we have not seen much new stuff yet. The only good addition was Rush but they removed it again. Their most important task was to get this out before christmas it seems. Now they can relax.
If they don't wake up, this franchise is dead.
Replace with Rush
- @GrizzGolf Yes. Rush should be official and have it's OWN BUTTON in the main screen / top bar together with All-Out Warfare, Hazard Zone and Portal.
Trend of hating on battlefield? Why do you think that is? I believe the majority of the fans aren’t looking for battlenite are we? I have no issues with past battlefield games love them all. But I just cannot get into this battlefield…
@-s0-SDBBFV was far worse than 2042 for me. Worst BF ever I think. I enjoyed 2042 ten times more even with all the bugs, that now are mostly fixed. Every single BF has been a mess on release, this is nothing new.
I love the new gunplay and movement system. Way faster paced now. Faster weapon switching etc. Earlier BF was much slower than other shooters.
2042 still has huge potential still. They have so many options to make this game great and we all know we will see alot more content coming. 4x Battle Pass, minimum. New maps, new weapons, new specialists and new game modes.
- @Incogn1too_zZz I enjoyed 2042 ten times more even with all the bugs, that now are mostly fixed. Every single BF has been a mess on release, this is nothing new.
Agreed, and also most titles release with bugs or missing parts, which has been industry standard for many years since the advent of online gaming. Even Halo is releasing three times, with the co-op campaign last in a few months, and co-opi s what made the original Halo an instant success as there was no XboxLive online play back then, so legacy features change all the time with most games.
To be honest I'd rather have some bugs and piece-meal games than wait another 6 months as I shelf games all the time once I get bored, and it is nice to have the new content every three months to make it interesting again via season passes, which is also becoming an industry standard.
