Rush XL
This mode is terrible on most of the maps. Maybe try it with 32 v 32 and see how it goes. Right now, a lot of the maps have choke points that are nearly impossible to advance past. Most matches on th...
Forum Discussion
While I do prefer Rush XL to regular Rush myself, it should be on the Portal tab and not replacing the normal version.
Dang, I thought XL Rush was normal. Only been playing a week.
I do enjoy playing XL Rush myself.
Now Squid G's chaos is cool. But every match I have played so far has about 15 people per a side or less.
I can't play Shutdown at all can't get more then 7 people to join.
I do hope Rush XL makes a comeback.
Edit: I'm on the Xbox one so I can see why the new gen consoles may not like it.
@AntiKhrist_X wrote:Dang, I thought XL Rush was normal. Only been playing a week.
I do enjoy playing XL Rush myself.
Now Squid G's chaos is cool. But every match I have played so far has about 15 people per a side or less.
I can't play Shutdown at all can't get more then 7 people to join.
I do hope Rush XL makes a comeback.
Edit: I'm on the Xbox one so I can see why the new gen consoles may not like it.
That's the thing, you can double the player count of Rush or Conquest or Breakthrough but FOUR TIMES the player count and passed off as a normal game mode is *. It's amazing DICE can eliminate BT128 and say they feel BT plays better on 64. But I can't play Rush 32 because DICE feels quadrupling the player count is good. Can we get an official word behind the thought process of this? It's beyond stupid.
