I do not play maps that are too sniper friendly.
Simple as that.
Problem solved.
@VOLBANKER_PC wrote:I do not play maps that are too sniper friendly.
Simple as that.
Problem solved.
I notice that when I played BF1-V small maps got played. BF3 too
There's a reason why small maps are the most popular: most people want the constant action of run-and-gun, and instant-gratification high kill counts. I would be so very pleased if BF gave us more of that. I prefer shooting over spending most of the time time traveling across a map to get to a position to engage. Personally, I couldn't care less about the huge maps with the jets and tanks; I would much rather engage in close quarters combat.
And to add to the sniper discussion, there is no way for someone to quick-scope a sniper rifle in real life, period, so if we're going for realism then that shouldn't be a part of it all. Just my 2 cents.
@ChugKendall wrote:Personally, I couldn't care less about the huge maps with the jets and tanks; I would much rather engage in close quarters combat.
It kind of sounds like Battlefield isn't the game for you. Those are all big pillars of what make Battlefield.. Battlefield. Usually there's 1 or 2 maps that are pretty CQB but the majority are what you don't want.
It will be interesting to see how the new maps are set up with the 'clusters' of control points - makes me think that they will cater to both play styles. Some clusters will provide for CQB while the no mans land in between will be more for vehicle and long distance combat. If I were you I would pay attention to that info in the coming months.
@ChugKendall wrote:
And to add to the sniper discussion, there is no way for someone to quick-scope a sniper rifle in real life, period, so if we're going for realism then that shouldn't be a part of it all. Just my 2 cents.
These games were never about realism. Sure there are elements of it but if it were completely realistic it wouldn't appeal to the masses because the systems would be too 'slow'. If it was a milsim do you really think they would have added a rendezook to the trailer?
I've played many versions of BF over the years. Thanks, but I'll be fine. Also, I do enjoy CoD's small maps, for example, but there's too much quick-scope sniper nonsense on there, now, so I hope BF will be a nice change of pace.
CoD MW has a sniper infestation, they quick scope while taking rounds...they will purposly take rounds beause they can 1 shot kill...its entirely rediculous. I just hope they dont cater to the the sniper trollls whose sole purpoee is to ruin other peoples experiences by not even trying to play the objectives. They are just gamings versions of trolls.
@ChugKendall wrote:There's a reason why small maps are the most popular: most people want the constant action of run-and-gun, and instant-gratification high kill counts. I would be so very pleased if BF gave us more of that. I prefer shooting over spending most of the time time traveling across a map to get to a position to engage. Personally, I couldn't care less about the huge maps with the jets and tanks; I would much rather engage in close quarters combat.
And to add to the sniper discussion, there is no way for someone to quick-scope a sniper rifle in real life, period, so if we're going for realism then that shouldn't be a part of it all. Just my 2 cents.
