Forum Discussion
Hi @Daniel--Swenson ,
You are probably after making it the absolute dream sniper rifle?? 😀
But if making it too perfect and too powerful even at range, then the vehicle whxres will be complaining loud again.
We already have the long range precision sniper in the DXR-1, so I am OK to nerf the range on the NTW-50, as long as its good for its intended purpose, namely to be able to counter the armed vehicles. That is a compromise I think we will need to accept for such gun that we can load as primary weapon. E,g, the all mighty railgun we had in BF4 was 'only' a pickup weapon on the map, so we had limited ammo to do with. And that also had a substantial trigger delay, which did not make that easy to shoot with at moving targets, though it definitely was a delight to use when good at handling it for taking out pesky choppers in midflight...
But now back to the current weapon parameters for the NTW-50:
- What is now the true damage it inflicts on e.g. a tank out at maybe a 50m range ?
- What is the time it takes to reload it, before you can place a second shot at same target?
Those two parameters are important to confirm if the NTW-50 is now back to do the job it was intended to serve for us in this game. Because at game launch one could maybe argue the damage was maybe a bit too much. But the time to reload was terribly long, so the vehicles typically were far away and out of sight before you could land a second shot on them. So except if you dealt with an already severely damaged enemy vehicle, you rarely had the chance to take them out purely by your own means. And after the nerf it became absolute totally useless.
The NTW honestly should have never been nerfed. It gave infantry a fighting chance against all vehicles.
About Battlefield 2042 General Discussion
Recent Discussions
- 7 hours ago
- 18 hours ago
- 24 hours ago
- 24 hours ago