Forum Discussion
EA-DICE becomes a meme about how dont release a videogame.
Battlefield was great until BF1, V was ok after a lot of work but the TTK changes made this unplayable a lot of time and they promised things that never were released...
Portal have maps that I guess they should implemented in V, but they need content to Portal. Even these 2 maps are incomplete and feels empty.
Tons of performance problems, lack of content, bad desing.
Portal is the best because reminds old BF but no weapons XP, custom servers 0 XP. And even with less players still unplayable because of poor optimization.
EA-DICE you really deserve real consequences, I feel cheated, your product doesnt deserve even 1 USD, is unplayable, boring and bad desing in so many ways...
If you didny buy it, dont buy 2042. Maybe when it cost 10 USD...
- 4 years ago
@ArchAngeL-PCX wrote:
@IPSEEEEENDoes Caspian Border seem way off to you? The match I was in, the entire wall separating C from B/A was basically gone. There were other things around D that felt missing. It was odd.It's based on the original Caspian Border from Battlefield 3 The wall was a feature added with the Battlefield 4 version of the map.
- 4 years ago@Noodlesocks That explains it then. I've been playing BF4 so long I couldn't remember the BF3 version lol
- Tha_Growler4 years agoNew Vanguard
The direction they have taken the game is nothing at all like previous battlefields. Even if the seasoned BF Devs left DICE and this was coded by newbies they had to take their direction from DICE management.
Has anyone at EA or DICE explained why they more or less abandoned the legacy of the Battlefield franchise?