@Tank2042Man Tactical Conquest isn't worse than what we have, but it isn't the best thing since sliced bread either.
The mode is created in Portal, so that sets the margins about what the mode can use.
So I stay with my observation, that all the linear maps I played, play like Operation Metro or Operation Locker, but without walls. The lack of cover in the bases and the lack of potential flanking routes makes this not an exceptional addition to the BF2042 modes.
The comparison to Domination is only true for the number of objectives and the number of players. But that stops, when Tactical Conquest has fixed bases where the players need to spawn.
I personally find it sad, when the scoreboard does not emphasis on objective play, but reduces everything to kills and revives.
My assumption is, that 16vs16 will play better, but will be unable to resolve the locked in spawn issues.
I believe that most negativity comes from the fact that 80% of the time limited content, is locked behind a pay wall. It is a digital form of fraudulent packaging, but that is something to expect with a free to play title.
So far Tactical Conquest has the potential, to enrich Battlefield Portal with a new mode, and new map sections. Maybe that could help small communities to experiment with BF2042 again. IF these options will be made available to the public.
