@GRiPSViGiL wrote:
@TickTack121BF will never feel like COD trash. Frostibite has always been the superior engine for gunplay and movement.
Doesnt matter if you create a COD in it is still a COD and Not a BF. I wouldnt Call frostige Superior to anything in 2021. We got the same bugs in every BF since BF4.
Named characters has got nothing to do in a Battlefield game - Maria, Boris and so on.
It would be more fitting in a roleplaying game, or a childrens game.
@VOLBANKER_PC wrote:Named characters has got nothing to do in a Battlefield game - Maria, Boris and so on.
It would be more fitting in a roleplaying game, or a childrens game.
Damn hard judgement, but..... so true that it hurts! :o)
Maybe it's EA's perverse way of making up for the missing campaign personas? As now we wont get the pleasure of playing 'Sergeant Daniel Recker' and doing all his crazy stunts and raids with his wonderful Marine Core Tombstone squad mates he had. Extraction pilot Hawkins, squad leader Dunn, CIA agent Laszlo Kovic, Irish and action lady Hannah!
Instead, we will now be stuck in some silly named specialists, with whom we do not get along...
Like a Rainbow Six released all way back in 2015.... Except back then it was maybe newsworthy...???
@GRiPSViGiL wrote:
@TickTack121Not talking about bugs. I am talking about 2 of the MAJOR components to gameplay that make a game good or not. So what if we have some features from COD...the actual gameplay of the core game is and always has been better. Perhaps the DICE folks just know how to utilize their engine better than the other developers use theirs. However, it's better in the main aspects as far as Multi-Player shooter games are concerned.
BF is more than the Frostbite-Engine. The engine is just a tool to create a game. It doesnt matter, which engine you use, if the game is crap. You got 100% BF, put 20% COD features in and do it again and again and again... and you will get a COD. I dont want BF to be a COD, thats the reason i have been only buying BF since i switched, when i was younger.
