I spent hours on falck and now they have taken the rockets out of her hands and given them to the engineer class. Those outside the engineer group were left completely defenseless against tanks, armored vehicles, helicopters and planes. congratulations, I applaud this great mind.
@uadarthmaul wrote:
@nukemetohellThat was the worst game of the last 3.
Not if you like the WW1 scenario and like to play a sniper. The maps in this game are awesome, the only thing that's bothering me is that it's infested with cheaters and EA doesn't give two sh..s about it anymore.
@uadarthmaul wrote:
@nukemetohellThat was the worst game of the last 3.
Beg to differ with sales figure.
Say what you want about BF1, but that's the pinnacle of this franchise, and any installment after 2042 will never toppled it. You can save, quote or screenshot my post, to prove me wrong in the future.
@r1zky24BF1 was overall a good entry.
But it also took advantage of a very lucky window where CoD infinite warfare's complete failure accidentally became a promotion for BF1.
People loved it even before it came out.
The internet was memeing in support of BF1
Battlefield 1 vs. Call Of Duty Infinite Warfare BEST Compilation #RIPCOD - YouTube
BF1 became a destination for CoD refuges like BF3.
@UP_Hawxxeye wrote:BF1 was overall a good entry.
But it also took advantage of a very lucky window where CoD infinite warfare's complete failure accidentally became a promotion for BF1.
People loved it even before it came out.The internet was memeing in support of BF1
Battlefield 1 vs. Call Of Duty Infinite Warfare BEST Compilation #RIPCOD - YouTube
BF1 became a destination for CoD refuges like BF3.
I am Call of Duty vets,been playing it since their first inception Call of Duty OG on peasantry console. I dump CoD because it feels more and more like Ctrl-C Ctrl-V in every installment, and doesn't offer anything "new", all weapon feel the same. Black Ops was a turning point for me, that garbage sway me to try Bad Company 2 and I love it every minute in single campaign.BF3 was the last series I played on console, then I started "the right way" ever since.
Okay I'll be on your shoes, what about Call of Duty Vanguard and Halo Infinite?
The CoD single player stories are usually awesome, but I hate multiplayer. Small maps and too fast paced for my taste.
@Adamonic wrote:
The Specialists are literally just skins. So instead of playing Assault as generic soldier (which would be cool), you can play as Dozer, Mackay, Sundance, or Zain. By selecting one of those, you get their Specialist gadget and trait, but that's it, that is the difference between previous class breakdowns and this one. You can still use any weapon now, which provides more flexibility than before.
The problem is this game was never intended to be a true BF title, it was BR or Hazard Zone with no more than 4 players (Quads). No need for factions, platoons, or CLASSES.
So we are where we are. If you want to use M5 or FXAA, you have to choose the skin that looks like Boris or Crawford, no biggie.
They're not just skins, you still have the Specialists horrible gadgets to contend with. IMO bringing the class system back is 100% a needed step and a vast improvement; I just wish they would have given us a real class system with weapon restrictions and no specialists and allow the Specialist crowd to play their own separate version of AOW. Of course we don't know player numbers so the current player numbers might not be able to support two versions of AOW.
@ragnarok013 wrote:
@Adamonic wrote:The Specialists are literally just skins. So instead of playing Assault as generic soldier (which would be cool), you can play as Dozer, Mackay, Sundance, or Zain. By selecting one of those, you get their Specialist gadget and trait, but that's it, that is the difference between previous class breakdowns and this one. You can still use any weapon now, which provides more flexibility than before.
The problem is this game was never intended to be a true BF title, it was BR or Hazard Zone with no more than 4 players (Quads). No need for factions, platoons, or CLASSES.
So we are where we are. If you want to use M5 or FXAA, you have to choose the skin that looks like Boris or Crawford, no biggie.They're not just skins, you still have the Specialists horrible gadgets to contend with. IMO bringing the class system back is 100% a needed step and a vast improvement; I just wish they would have given us a real class system with weapon restrictions and no specialists and allow the Specialist crowd to play their own separate version of AOW. Of course we don't know player numbers so the current player numbers might not be able to support two versions of AOW.
How is taking stuff away from players an improvement? How is forcing the players to play the game in a certain way an improvement?
@nukemetohell wrote:
@ragnarok013 wrote:
@Adamonic wrote:
The Specialists are literally just skins. So instead of playing Assault as generic soldier (which would be cool), you can play as Dozer, Mackay, Sundance, or Zain. By selecting one of those, you get their Specialist gadget and trait, but that's it, that is the difference between previous class breakdowns and this one. You can still use any weapon now, which provides more flexibility than before.
The problem is this game was never intended to be a true BF title, it was BR or Hazard Zone with no more than 4 players (Quads). No need for factions, platoons, or CLASSES.
So we are where we are. If you want to use M5 or FXAA, you have to choose the skin that looks like Boris or Crawford, no biggie.They're not just skins, you still have the Specialists horrible gadgets to contend with. IMO bringing the class system back is 100% a needed step and a vast improvement; I just wish they would have given us a real class system with weapon restrictions and no specialists and allow the Specialist crowd to play their own separate version of AOW. Of course we don't know player numbers so the current player numbers might not be able to support two versions of AOW.
How is taking stuff away from players an improvement? How is forcing the players to play the game in a certain way an improvement?
The feedback about going back to being a Battlefield game in form, fit, and function has been met with overwhelming praise from the wider Battlefield community. Like it or not the majority of Battlefield players didn't like playing a Battlefield skinned Apex game and are very happy with this change. I do wish that DICE listened to the feedback I gave and kept a legacy Specialist version of AOW for guys like you while allowing the rest of us a Battlefield version of AOW to play to more fully satisfy both kinds of players.
