After donating money to EA and DICE for this horrible excuse for a game i think its only fair that the next entry is something for the fans!!A direct sequel to bad company 2 or battlefield 3, or fully remastered versions of those games. What they are doing to the franchise that we all love is scandalous and they should feel ashamed!! Checkout the link i added!!give us BAD COMPANY 3!!!

Bad Company is just a name. Dice LA/Ripple Effect would probably do it (and Battlefield) justice but Dice Sweden will likely make as much a mess of it as they have their past 3 games.

@cornybbq2 Why would you think BC3 would be any better? It's going to be developed by the inept people that gave you 2042.How would you feel if 2042 had bad company labeled on it. Would that make it better?Dice needs to purge the diversity of game design. This games feels like a a bunch of first year interns put ideas in a hat and then pulled them out and tried to make a game.

Folks, you need to understand even if DICE made a BC3 it would still be the same s*** show you are seeing with 2042. This is not the same team who made the greats of BC2, BF3, BF4 and BF1. Those great developers are long gone. This gang does not know what BF is all about and have probably not even played a BF game. I mean truly played it as a passion like the rest of us. Just seeing those cringe worthy specialists at the end of the game makes me know this team plays more Fortnite and Overwatch than BF.

@cornybbq2I'll gladly take a remastered BF3. Honestly just make the remastered exactly like the original but just improve the graphics. A console peasant like myself didn't get to experience BF3 at it's finest.

We deserve bad company 3 after this terrible battlefield!

16 Replies

cornybbq2
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago
@cornybbq2 Check the link!
xXHappy_PuppyXx
Rising Ace
4 years ago
@cornybbq2 Why would you think BC3 would be any better? It's going to be developed by the inept people that gave you 2042.

How would you feel if 2042 had bad company labeled on it. Would that make it better?

Dice needs to purge the diversity of game design. This games feels like a a bunch of first year interns put ideas in a hat and then pulled them out and tried to make a game.
Noodlesocks
4 years ago
Bad Company is just a name. Dice LA/Ripple Effect would probably do it (and Battlefield) justice but Dice Sweden will likely make as much a mess of it as they have their past 3 games.
HillbillyJohn
Seasoned Veteran
4 years ago
@cornybbq2 Works for me! 👍😎
CyberDyme
4 years ago
@Noodlesocks wrote:
Bad Company is just a name. Dice LA/Ripple Effect would probably do it (and Battlefield) justice but Dice Sweden will likely make as much a mess of it as they have their past 3 games.
Exactly right @Noodlesocks !
Matter of fact, it would be an insult to the BFBC identity and soul if a BFBC3 was to be made by the same incompetent game designers and programmers that have put this BF2042 on out the street in this shocking poor state...
cornybbq2
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago
@CyberDyme I agree with both of you! But that doesn’t change the fact that a good battlefield game is loooong overdue… bigger is not better!! Stop changing the formula of the game to the point you don’t even recognize it anymore.

Go back to the roots… smaller well designed maps, 32 player rush/domination/Teamdeathmatch and 64 player conquest/breakthroug. bring back all the game mechanics from previous games and you have a hit game… its so simple, how do they manage to f u ck it up so much?
MogwaiWarrior
4 years ago
Folks, you need to understand even if DICE made a BC3 it would still be the same s*** show you are seeing with 2042. This is not the same team who made the greats of BC2, BF3, BF4 and BF1. Those great developers are long gone. This gang does not know what BF is all about and have probably not even played a BF game. I mean truly played it as a passion like the rest of us. Just seeing those cringe worthy specialists at the end of the game makes me know this team plays more Fortnite and Overwatch than BF.
ArchAngeL-PCX
4 years ago
@cornybbq2I do think Bad Co 3 should be next.

I was just thinking while replying to another thread...the specialists would honestly be better in a Bad Company game. I'm reminded of Bad Company 1 and how good those characters were in the single player. That's the kind of personality that made the Apex Legends and Overwatch heroes so popular. If they leaned into that, they could absolutely sell a "specialist" feature in Battlefield Bad Company 3.
cornybbq2
Seasoned Ace
4 years ago
@ArchAngeL-PCX you’re absolutely right! Specialist or no specialists i don’t really care about that anymore, as long as they fix the maps (make them a little more realistic and put some time and effort into them) and fix the gameplay i’m a happy boy!
ragnarok013
Hero+
4 years ago
@cornybbq2 Just curious, what makes a Bad Company title a Bad Company entry to you and not just a Battlefield game? Obviously the campaign is the biggest difference, but Bad Co from a multiplayer perspective has always been as small game than main line Battlefield games regarding player counts and equipment and the industry has been consistently moving towards larger player counts and removing campaigns as an unnecessary cost.

I'm not sure many people would be in favor of what many would call a reduced BF experience by removing jets and limiting player counts to 32 players per server.