weapons need to be locked into classes
If the devs are going to try to go back to classes the weapons need to be locked to classes as well. This frankenstein class system is not what the community was asking for and if classes are going ...
Forum Discussion
@Psubond It's also something I've always disliked about Battlefield games. It never made any sense. Besides "that's how it's always been done", what would be the point? How would it improve the game? I don't see any benefit or improvement to the game in doing that.
I also don't like the weapon perks being tied to certain Classes. Overall, they're pretty minor, but I still don't like the concept of it.
Why do you want this change? Please explain, because I really don't understand this point of view. Feels a little scorched Earth lol. I didn't like this last patch either.
I also don't like the weapon perks being tied to certain Classes. Overall, they're pretty minor, but I still don't like the concept of it.
Why do you want this change? Please explain, because I really don't understand this point of view. Feels a little scorched Earth lol. I didn't like this last patch either.
@RaginSam wrote:
It's also something I've always disliked about Battlefield games. It never made any sense. Besides "that's how it's always been done", what would be the point?
You know what? This is probably what the newer Battlefield developers that worked on this game were thinking too. Which is part of the reason why they originally changed it.
Battlefield has been my favorite multiplayer series since Bad Company, and I have never liked the weapon and class restrictions either. I just tolerated them because of my enjoyment of the overall games that I was playing.
