What is the fascination with classes?
why are people so wrapped around the axle on not allowing the flexibility that we have now and insisting on restricting the playstyle of others? people can set their loadout however they like so the...
Forum Discussion
I am sure you have already read my response to this before but to me, classes feel so restrictive now. Also I hardly even noticed what the enemy even looked like. I have always looked for the red icon above their head. Oh, look a red icon I will kill him now. I think they use the class's excuse to fuel their argument. It is like people keep saying there is no cover on the maps when we all know there is plenty of cover.
@CantGetRight wrote:I am sure you have already read my response to this before but to me, classes feel so restrictive now. Also I hardly even noticed what the enemy even looked like. I have always looked for the red icon above their head. Oh, look a red icon I will kill him now. I think they use the class's excuse to fuel their argument. It is like people keep saying there is no cover on the maps when we all know there is plenty of cover.
Pre BFV as a tanker I knew which infantry I needed to be worried about just based on their class.
The specialists started the whole hate train ball rolling and you're so right about the maps.
There's as much infantry cover as in any previous large map we've played on in the series and that includes so called fan favourites like Caspian Border.
For an explanation about this complete disconnect from reality with the cancel mob, look into Mass Formation Psychosis.
@Tank2042Man Maybe there's as much infantry cover as the previous "large maps" in games, but in previous games those "large maps" were only 1-2 maps out of the total launch pool. The rest of the maps played very different. Some were much tighter with more cover where infantry had an advantage, and most landed in-between these two extremes. Different maps rewarded different gameplay styles as a result.
In 2042, every match included at launch was a "large map", and those that enjoy a different style of gameplay are left with nothing that caters to them. There are no maps included that rewarded infantry or tight cqb gameplay. No urban maps, not even a Grand Bazaar, much less some metro-style map.
@Dsmilees wrote:@Tank2042Man Maybe there's as much infantry cover as the previous "large maps" in games, but in previous games those "large maps" were only 1-2 maps out of the total launch pool. The rest of the maps played very different. Some were much tighter with more cover where infantry had an advantage, and most landed in-between these two extremes. Different maps rewarded different gameplay styles as a result.
In 2042, every match included at launch was a "large map", and those that enjoy a different style of gameplay are left with nothing that caters to them. There are no maps included that rewarded infantry or tight cqb gameplay. No urban maps, not even a Grand Bazaar, much less some metro-style map.
Well I agree that the game should have launched with a inf only map or two. Even BF1942 had Berlin and Stalingrad for urban inf warfare. They had tanks but they were not dominant on those maps.
