WHO CAN RUN THE FASTEST? Was it soldiers in BF4, BF1, BFV or BF2042? I see this has been talked about a lot recently so I tested it. Here in this side by side comparison to find out who wins.
Here again the official Soldier Sprint Speeds for BF2042, compared with some previous titles.
by DICE Developer "DRUNKKZ3"
Default | Tactical
Greets,
Travis
@alucardgr wrote:
@YT_SMKGAMINGanother good idea is to check the time that needs to turn the turret in a tank (360 degree for example)
Good idea @alucardgr ,
But in previous BF games we also had the option to change the sensitivity setting for the turret's turning speed. We didnt have that in BF2042 Beta, but agreed its an absolute "Must Have" for the final game, as the beta setting was bad.
@cso7777 wrote:
@Trokey66Personally I think BF4 has the most broken movement system of the last titles and this is often abused by seasoned BF4-vets. Jumping is bad in BF4 and some of the animations when vaulting/coming out of water sometimes makes you "invulnerable".
BFV is pretty bad regarding ADAD-spam though.
But now we got the proof in OPs video, nice.
Yeah, and BFV is the most egregious for invulnerability frames.
A video on ADAD spam would be nice to see once 2042 is out. BF1 and 5 may have the same movement speed but Dice LA did really well with momentum in BF1 and BF4, giving players weight to their movement while Dice Sweden did nothing to fix the momentum issues in BF5.
@CyberDyme wrote:
Maybe somebody here online knows the the real-life requirements for a special forces soldier, to compare @YT_SMKGAMING interesting BF speed analytics to real life?
Special stricter requirements are in place for load-bearing branches like infantry or artillery, which I guess would be the best benchmark for our BF soldiers running fully loaded here. 😀
Standard running requirement for a US marine in combat fitness is to run the 880 yards "Movement to Contact test" in less than 2 minutes and 45 seconds. So like 805 meters in under 165 seconds. So approx. 17.6 km/h. But that is without the gear.
Anybody aware of official test targets for soldiers fully loaded out?
@CyberDyme wrote:
Maybe somebody here online knows the the real-life requirements for a special forces soldier, to compare @YT_SMKGAMING interesting BF speed analytics to real life?
Special stricter requirements are in place for load-bearing branches like infantry or artillery, which I guess would be the best benchmark for our BF soldiers running fully loaded here. 😀
Standard running requirement for a US marine in combat fitness is to run the 880 yards "Movement to Contact test" in less than 2 minutes and 45 seconds. So like 805 meters in under 165 seconds. So approx. 17.6 km/h. But that is without the gear.
Anybody aware of official test targets for soldiers fully loaded out?
@CyberDyme as a former US Army Armor branch combat veteran (I was an embedded Advisor in an Iraqi Infantry company while deployed) we didn't have any specific APFT physical requirements separate from non-Combat Arms branch but the new ACFT may have changed that since I've been out. Now we do have internal branch cultural norms saying "X" time is the time you should be doing your 2 mile run, "X" number of pushups, "X" number of situps etc. or you're a bad Soldier, which is typically much more strict than non-combat arms branches.
In combat on foot I personally never ran long distances, we normally do movement to contact either mounted or walking to the vicinity of the objective. Then you begin your assault and typically do 3-5 second rushes cover to cover if being shot at. It is hard to fight if you're exhausted from running - especially if you have on 80+ extra pounds of armor, ammo, water, etc. I did continuously run a long way down a driveway assaulting a Ba'athist mansion but that was the exception in my tour. I used to jest that I only ran when being shot at, and even then probably not. lol Maybe some of the Infantry Branch combat vets here can chime in with their experiences.
For Special Forces guys their normal training is rather physical, this is a good example of that: https://www.military.com/military-fitness/army-special-operations/army-green-beret-training
@CyberDyme wrote:Maybe somebody here online knows the the real-life requirements for a special forces soldier, to compare @YT_SMKGAMING interesting BF speed analytics to real life?
Special stricter requirements are in place for load-bearing branches like infantry or artillery, which I guess would be the best benchmark for our BF soldiers running fully loaded here. 😀
Standard running requirement for a US marine in combat fitness is to run the 880 yards "Movement to Contact test" in less than 2 minutes and 45 seconds. So like 805 meters in under 165 seconds. So approx. 17.6 km/h. But that is without the gear.
Anybody aware of official test targets for soldiers fully loaded out?
To be clear, for the 880m “Movement to Contact” (MTC) phase of the Combat Fitness Test (CFT), and for the entire conduct of the CFT, Marines will be in boots and utility trousers (until the “Maneuver under Fire” portion where the blouse goes back on).
That 2:45 time was the original MTC maximum score time for the youngest age group. It is now 2:38 for the max score in the 21-25 age group.
Also, it sucks. The entire CFT is an anaerobic workout, but the MTC will really leave you winded. Sprinting in boots and trousers will do that though…. for comparison, WR 880m is 1:42…
There is no official “full gear” standardized movement test. This is likely deemed unnecessary since other, more general testing is already in place and the deleterious long term effects of all-out movement in full-gear that is still uniformly sized and as such, not individually ergonomic at all.
Ultimately, fighting and moving in full gear is utterly exhausting and could not be realistically maintained for long periods and would also cause a corresponding, degrading effect on combat effectiveness.
Whose to say 1 meter in one game is equal to 1 meter in another game.
