@Billy_bSLAYERAh interesting, you'd think they wouldn't make people literally do extensive in-depth deep dive into the damage to figure it out.
Also, that chart points out that the AA damage from and Anti-AIR Tank to an Air Unit is absolutely awful. holy cow.
(re-post remove to read easier)
Sorry it was marked as spam, you filed a complaint, I hope.
Yeah, agree with everything posted.
@Lady_OneBF42 logic, One hit with shield, two hits with a literally 50mm cannon. Its such a Mickey Mouse game, and there are literally hours of youtube videos breaking down numbers of issues, and lacking of details. Still even recently. It is, without question, one of the worst displays of neglects to fans & psychics
@l_Darkjedi_lThe 50mm will 1shot kill people on a direct hit fairly often. Not always, dunno why, probably a bug, could be splash+direct hit damage. It will not 1shot if you miss. Don't miss. It's a video game and there has to be balance, it's not real life. If the shield was not a 1 hit kill, the slower turning speed would mean you can just eat the hit from a dozer and circle around him and knife him from the back, free kill. If the turning speed was fast to account for that, it would be too easy for dozer to protect from flanks. If that was the case and instead you could, say, break a piece of glass in dozer's shield with any explosion to give it some other weakness, it would be useless, as we've already seen.
Even if the 50mm always didn't 1shot people, that's fine because it's already very strong, it has higher vehicle DPS than any other weapon available for 50mm seats, AND still has some splash to fight against infantry. What's the alternative? Making vehicles even stronger against infantry? Completely devolving the game into get hit once from nowhere, instantly die, regardless of vehicle or infantry?
Complete realism is 99% of the time a bad metric for making an enjoyable game. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuTkgi7scKo
Not to mention in terms in content, I mean this very literally, every single battlefield game, wait, I mean literally, since bad company had more content, you can count, in fact, I challenge you to do so, and get back with me after documenting it. It servers as a gross example of a incomplete, un-thought out, un-planned, un-original , shot in the dark of an unacceptable product.
Without a question, not just game for a battlefield game, but indeed bad for any triple A FPS game.
PEOPLE AND HELIS AND LITERALLY JUST WALK INTO YOUR RESPWN
we also should not celebrate the fact DICE took an absolutely dumpster fire of a game, and making a barely playable COD with big maps
Agree with everything you have said. However I do believe they are aware of this and are working to address these issues in the next title. Time will tell but Im cautiously optimistic about the whole situation. This franchise has given me so much fun for 20 years so the failures lately have really hurt.
WHO has butchered this thread and WHY has good input from people been deleted ?
There was some good input in it from people with valid and accurate points, and yet it's a mess now with missing information which leaves it in an unintelligent mess which is hard to read.
You should NOT be allowed to do this in a free speech world in a game forum, unless you are saying we can only post in here as long as we are being positive and lying about how great everything is!
@l_Darkjedi_lEA has disappointed the entire player base including my self. I was scammed into buying the Ultimate Pre-order. EA only cares about the investors/stockholders and does NOT care about the player base that made EA what it is today. Disappointed from completely butchering and severing BFV to making false promises for BF2042. The new title that they're working on now is their make or break. Battlefield has become a VERY successful money grabbing business.
Hi All,
Since the original thread has been released from the spam filter from the look of things, I've merged it with the existing one so everything is together (the flow may be a bit odd on the first couple of pages).
